Incoming from Robert Holtzman:
Your dreaming. In my experience 99.9% of the replies are why would I
want to?
That's when you get a chance to explain it. Wouldn't it be neat if
you could order weed from your dealer via email? :-O As opposed to
over the phone with ATT forwarding all your
Incoming from Will Fiveash:
As a side note, I wonder if a pgp/gpg signature as proof of authorship
has ever been tested in court? My guess is no.
The legal community considers fax to be cutting edge reliable tech.
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 04:35:07PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from Robert Holtzman:
Your dreaming. In my experience 99.9% of the replies are why would I
want to?
That's when you get a chance to explain it. Wouldn't it be neat if
you could order weed from your dealer via email?
On Thursday, 28 February, 2013 at 19:24:44 GMT, Will Fiveash wrote:
- Why sign most messages?
I'd rather everyone/everything use PGP. I sign personal messages, even though I
know the recipient doesn't use PGP, to at least spread awareness of what it is
and that on the off-chance that the
me delete attachments
Thanks for the idea. I've attached a patch
Thank you very much David (for the initial idea) Will (for
creating that patch)!
It works perfectly B-)
Wow, I sure am happy, and surprised, to find out that I'm not the only
one to find it useful to knowingly break e-mail
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 06:34:03PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
Will Fiveash wrote:
The why is that you are adding needless bloat to most messages you send.
One person's needless bloat is another's digital signature, I guess.
Yep, just like one salesperson's HTML format e-mail with a
and it took me little time
to find out that you can't delete attachments in signed/encrypted
mails ... ;-)
I patched my copy of mutt so that it will let me delete attachments
from encrypted messages (breaking the signature along the way). I can
try to find said patch if there is some interest (it's
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 01:24:44PM -0600, Will Fiveash wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:55:39PM +0100, Stefan Wimmer wrote:
Hi all,
I recently started to sign all my mails and it took me little time to find
out that you can't delete attachments in signed/encrypted mails ... ;-)
Now
Will Fiveash wrote:
The why is that you are adding needless bloat to most messages you send.
One person's needless bloat is another's digital signature, I guess.
Take for example the message you sent that I'm responding to. Does
anyone care that it actually came from you and wasn't tampered
Hi all,
I recently started to sign all my mails and it took me little time to find out
that you can't delete attachments in signed/encrypted mails ... ;-)
Now I want to automate the way I use crypt_autosign that mutt checks first if
there is an attachment and only signs the mail if that's
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:55:39PM +0100, Stefan Wimmer wrote:
Hi all,
I recently started to sign all my mails and it took me little time to find
out that you can't delete attachments in signed/encrypted mails ... ;-)
Now I want to automate the way I use crypt_autosign that mutt checks
to
attachments which are a classic attack vector?
I believe it is *mostly* for show. I can so I will, see me.
Your questions/statement are spot on.
And some may not know how to sign one message and not another
--
(paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711
http
of a message shouldn't this concern also extend to
attachments which are a classic attack vector?
I believe it is *mostly* for show. I can so I will, see me.
Your questions/statement are spot on.
And some may not know how to sign one message and not another
OK OK - I got it ...
Thank you very
* Stefan Wimmer swim...@xs4all.nl, 2013-02-28 12:55:39 Thu:
I recently started to sign all my mails and it took me little time
to find out that you can't delete attachments in signed/encrypted
mails ... ;-)
I patched my copy of mutt so that it will let me delete attachments
from encrypted
is concerned enough about allowing others to verify the
integrity of a message shouldn't this concern also extend to
attachments which are a classic attack vector?
[...]
Will: you have a very valid point with your second statement ... I didn't
look at it that way but was only concerned about
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 02:43:36PM -0600, Will Fiveash wrote:
I wasn't referring to you specifically as I see you did publish your
pubkey properly. Instead, I was referring to others (like s.keeling)
that sign everything yet I can not retrieve their pubkey.
I'm actually working with him on
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 03:35:44PM -0500, David Haguenauer wrote:
* Stefan Wimmer swim...@xs4all.nl, 2013-02-28 12:55:39 Thu:
I recently started to sign all my mails and it took me little time
to find out that you can't delete attachments in signed/encrypted
mails ... ;-)
I patched my
attachments in signed/encrypted
mails ... ;-)
I patched my copy of mutt so that it will let me delete attachments
from encrypted messages (breaking the signature along the way). I can
try to find said patch if there is some interest (it's a one-liner).
Thanks for the idea. I've
Incoming from Will Fiveash:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:55:39PM +0100, Stefan Wimmer wrote:
I recently started to sign all my mails and it took me little time
to find out that you can't delete attachments in signed/encrypted
mails ... ;-)
Now I want to automate the way I use
Incoming from Will Fiveash:
I wasn't referring to you specifically as I see you did publish your
pubkey properly. Instead, I was referring to others (like s.keeling)
that sign everything yet I can not retrieve their pubkey.
... which is very annoying to me too.
El día Thursday, January 24, 2013 a las 03:33:21PM +0100, Matthias Apitz
escribió:
Hi,
I want to send out an e-mail with an inline JPEG attachments...
I set (based on some hint) in my .muttrc
set attach_format=%u%D%I %t%4n %T%.40d% [%.7m/%.10M, %.6e%?C?, %C?, %s]
which seems
Hi,
I want to send out an e-mail with an inline JPEG attachments...
I set (based on some hint) in my .muttrc
set attach_format=%u%D%I %t%4n %T%.40d% [%.7m/%.10M, %.6e%?C?, %C?, %s]
which seems to be the default in any case if I look into muttrc(5)
and I use from the cmd line:
$ mutt -s mail
Incoming from Matthias Apitz:
I want to send out an e-mail with an inline JPEG attachments...
I set (based on some hint) in my .muttrc
set attach_format=%u%D%I %t%4n %T%.40d% [%.7m/%.10M, %.6e%?C?, %C?, %s]
which seems to be the default in any case if I look into muttrc(5)
and I use
Matthias Apitz wrote:
I want to send out an e-mail with an inline JPEG attachments...
I set (based on some hint) in my .muttrc
set attach_format=%u%D%I %t%4n %T%.40d% [%.7m/%.10M, %.6e%?C?, %C?, %s]
which seems to be the default in any case if I look into muttrc(5)
and I use from
| - No system with backdoors like Apple/Android
E-mail: g...@unixarea.de | - No HTML/RTF in E-mail
WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | - No proprietary attachments
phone: +49-170-4527211 | - Respect for open standards
Will Yardley mutt-us...@veggiechinese.net writes:
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 05:12:05AM +, Jeffery Small wrote:
Within a script, I would like to use mutt to automatically email a JPEG
file as an attachment without user intervention. Is there any way to
accomplish this? (And if not with
On 01Dec2012 08:14, Jeffery Small j...@cjsa.com wrote:
| Will Yardley mutt-us...@veggiechinese.net writes:
| You shouldn't need to do any special encoding, and mutt -a should do
| what you want.
[...]
| Will:
| Thanks so much for your quick reply. You are exactly right, the problem was
| that the
I'm using mutt 1.5.21 on a Solaris 10 machine.
Within a script, I would like to use mutt to automatically email a JPEG
file as an attachment without user intervention. Is there any way to
accomplish this? (And if not with mutt, then possibly with mail(1) or
mailx(?))
When I try to use the -a
Hi,
I often get attachments with completely wrong MIME types. For example
today I received a pdf and a doc file as application/octet-stream. Is
there anyway to bypass my mailcap and ask mutt to open the attachment
with the proper application? So in this particular case, I would want
to open
Suvayu Ali wrote (Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 02:25:37PM +0100):
I often get attachments with completely wrong MIME types. For example
today I received a pdf and a doc file as application/octet-stream. Is
there anyway to bypass my mailcap and ask mutt to open the attachment
with the proper
Hi Mandar,
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 07:26:28PM +0530, Mandar Mitra wrote:
Suvayu Ali wrote (Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 02:25:37PM +0100):
I often get attachments with completely wrong MIME types. For example
today I received a pdf and a doc file as application/octet-stream. Is
there anyway
On 2012-11-19, Suvayu Ali wrote:
Hi,
I often get attachments with completely wrong MIME types. For example
today I received a pdf and a doc file as application/octet-stream. Is
there anyway to bypass my mailcap and ask mutt to open the attachment
with the proper application? So
On 2012-11-19, Gary Johnson garyj...@spocom.com wrote:
For application/octet-stream attachments, put this in your muttrc:
mime_lookup application/octet-stream
That tells mutt to determine the correct MIME type by looking up the
file name extension in your mime.types file
Brilliant
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:41:48AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
On 2012-11-19, Suvayu Ali wrote:
Hi,
I often get attachments with completely wrong MIME types. For example
today I received a pdf and a doc file as application/octet-stream. Is
there anyway to bypass my mailcap and ask
Hello Mazart,
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 8:14 PM, P. Mazart pmaz...@web.de wrote:
Hi Oscar,
Oscar Pereira schrieb am 16.11.2012 19:08:25:
As it turns out, there is a workaround to this issue, which is to tag
the attachments you want, and then hit ;f. This works, but is *really*
cumbersome
Hi Oscar,
Oscar Pereira schrieb am 16.11.2012 19:08:25:
As it turns out, there is a workaround to this issue, which is to tag
the attachments you want, and then hit ;f. This works, but is *really*
cumbersome.
Can’t this be put into a macro somehow?
P.M.
Apple Mail has concealed attachments from me for the last time I hope!
I noted a while ago that Apple Mail puts attachments inside the HTML
half of the multipart/alternative container instead of outside in an
outer multipart/mixed. If you've set up to prefer the plain text half
mutt doesn't show
Hi,
Is there a filter to select mails with text/calendar attachments?
Best regards,
Alexis
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Jul 2012, Alexis Letessier wrote:
Hi,
Is there a filter to select mails with text/calendar attachments?
Best regards,
Alexis
--
David Champion • d...@uchicago.edu • IT Services • University of Chicago
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 03:42:43PM +0100, Chris Burdess wrote:
Harald Weis wrote:
I have still a problem with attachments like so:
[-- Attachment #2: =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9sum=E9_des_devis.xls?= --]
[-- Type: application/vnd.ms-excel, Encoding: base64, Size: 45K
Hello All,
I have still a problem with attachments like so:
[-- Attachment #2: =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9sum=E9_des_devis.xls?= --]
[-- Type: application/vnd.ms-excel, Encoding: base64, Size: 45K --]
This is annoying because I cannot open it directly with gnumeric.
My (FreeBSD) System
Harald Weis wrote:
Hello All,
I have still a problem with attachments like so:
[-- Attachment #2: =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9sum=E9_des_devis.xls?= --]
[-- Type: application/vnd.ms-excel, Encoding: base64, Size: 45K --]
This is annoying because I cannot open it directly
Hi,
I understand that 'Content-Transfer-Encoding' must be correct, just to
be able to understand the following lines and decode them to something
usefull; but why must 'Content-Type' be used to save the file to disk:
this should only be used to get an idea how to deal (view) the file;
yes,
* At 2012-02-21T11:19+0100, aitor wrote:
So my question is: is any way to tell mutt ok, the mime information may
be wrong. In any case, I want you to save the attachment as-is to the
disc, i.e. without any translation etc.
Quick idea, untested: does it make any difference if you '|cat file'
on this in the original message. The problem is that one
has to be aware of the problem to manually set the mime type. But
usually I don't pay attention to the mime type of attachments, and,
honestly, I don't want any translation preformed on attachments at
all. So my question was if there is a way to automatically
)
Modify then the content type and save the file
yes, I comment on this in the original message. The problem is that one
has to be aware of the problem to manually set the mime type. But
usually I don't pay attention to the mime type of attachments, and,
honestly, I don't want any translation
Hi,
In the past couple of days I've been hit by this behaviour. I'm using
mutt 1.5.21 compiled from scratch. Suppose that I receive a mail with
several attachments:
I 1 no description [multipa/alternativ, 7bit, 7.2K]
I 2 ├─no description [text/plain, 7bit, iso-8859-1, 0.7K]
I
by this behaviour. I'm using
mutt 1.5.21 compiled from scratch. Suppose that I receive a mail with
several attachments:
I 1 no description [multipa/alternativ, 7bit, 7.2K]
I 2 ├─no description [text/plain, 7bit, iso-8859-1, 0.7K]
I 3 └─no description [text/html, 7bit, iso
Dear Mutt Users,
sorry for bugging you with some stupid questions. I want to
forward an attachment (being in the attachment viewer) as
an attachment, but mutt always copys the HTML text into the
message body. I
- have not 'autoview text/html' in my muttrc file
- enter the attachemnt viewer
-
Hi,
I would like to be able to save attachments for a message to a folder
based on the alias_name.
e.g., when I hit s on an attachment it fills in `save-entry` with
~/downloads/email_sender/attachment1.doc
There doesn't seem to be any attachment hooks to speak of.
Using a macro
Hello,
i would forward a received mail with his attachments, but for my mutt's
configuration it do not happens: is it possible and how can i do?
Best regards
Massimo
* Mailing Lists m-li...@massimo.arnaudo.name:
Hello,
i would forward a received mail with his attachments, but for my mutt's
configuration it do not happens: is it possible and how can i do?
set mime_forward=yes
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité
On Monday 11/21/11 18:44:13 CST, Mailing Lists wrote:
Hello,
i would forward a received mail with his attachments, but for my mutt's
configuration it do not happens: is it possible and how can i do?
Best regards
Massimo
I think it could be done by following steps,
a) press 'v' to view
--]
[-- Type: image/png, Encoding: base64, Size: 238K --]
[-- image/png is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --]
I don’t mind saving a copy of the attachments I sent (I don’t send many, and
they’re usually not very large), but I can understand the desire not to save
them. Loathe as I am
to
all of us at some time.
Do you mean display in the pager whether there’s an attachment included with
the message? When I send attachments, they *are* included in the copy saved to
my “Sent Messages” folder, and I can view it on a message by message basis, but
there’s no indicator or flag
Hi is it possible to somehow record in 'sent' if and what attachment
has been sent?
Sometimes I wonder if I forget to attach something as I'm happens to
all of us at some time.
D.
--
Don't look back, the lemmings are gaining on you.
an attachment included with
the message? When I send attachments, they *are* included in the copy saved to
my “Sent Messages” folder, and I can view it on a message by message basis, but
there’s no indicator or flag in the pager to show that a message has an
attachment.
Mike
attachments, they *are* included in the copy saved
to my “Sent Messages” folder, and I can view it on a message by message
basis, but there’s no indicator or flag in the pager to show that a message
has an attachment.
Mike
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 03:30:56PM +, Camaleón
wrote:
All the process works fine but some of the files
are wrongly encoded which results in an error
when the user tries to reconstruct the big file
from the received attachments.
becaue you split archive, pieces start with random
of tests) that compressing the resulting files
after they're splitted is doing the trick. Annoying and time consuming
but at least the attachments (.zip) are being encoded in the right manner.
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
attachments.
becaue you split archive, pieces start with random data and e.g. 'file'
utility may detect data type wrongly. I don't know how mutt performs
data type autodetection, but if it involves the 'file' utility, you may
want to try substituting system 'file' with your own shellscript, which
Hello,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:01:12PM +, Camaleón
wrote:
What puzzles me is that raw splitted files
stored in my disk all look the same. I mean,
file returns the same information for all of
them but then, when I review my Gmail's sent
folder I see 3 or 4 of the attachments were bad
Gmail's sent folder I see 3 or 4 of the
attachments were bad encoded while the rest (20 or 25) are fine :-?
So this is how attachments look on the receiving end:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 03:30:56PM +, Camaleón wrote:
For instance, I've noted that properly encoded attachments appear
Hello,
I'm facing a curious problem when I send attachments with Mutt from
command line.
I have a small self-made script that basically makes two things:
1/ Given a big file (~10/20 MiB), it splits into small chunks of data
(~250 KiB)
2/ Then it sends the resulting files using Mutt (each
On 11.08.11,15:30, Camaleón wrote:
Hello,
I'm facing a curious problem when I send attachments with Mutt from
command line.
I have a small self-made script that basically makes two things:
1/ Given a big file (~10/20 MiB), it splits into small chunks of data
(~250 KiB)
2
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 17:37:42 +0200, Jostein Berntsen wrote:
On 11.08.11,15:30, Camaleón wrote:
I'm facing a curious problem when I send attachments with Mutt from
command line.
(...)
All the process works fine but some of the files are wrongly encoded
which results in an error when
On 8/11/2011 11:37 AM, Jostein Berntsen wrote:
What about putting the files in 2-3 zip files and send him? Also update to
mutt
1.5.21 which have many bug fixes after 1.5.18.
Greetings Camaleón,
Aye, I was going to suggest a split archive as well, then there should
be no need to encode the
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:57:26 -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
On 8/11/2011 11:37 AM, Jostein Berntsen wrote:
What about putting the files in 2-3 zip files and send him? Also update
to mutt 1.5.21 which have many bug fixes after 1.5.18.
Greetings Camaleón,
Aye, I was going to suggest a split
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 16:15:47 +, Camaleón wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:57:26 -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
On 8/11/2011 11:37 AM, Jostein Berntsen wrote:
What about putting the files in 2-3 zip files and send him? Also
update to mutt 1.5.21 which have many bug fixes after 1.5.18.
On 8/11/2011 12:26 PM, Camaleón wrote:
zsplit cannot do it. It requires the splitted size is at least the size
of the smallest of the archived files. I will have to search another
one ;-(
zip -s SIZE should do the trick ... split the archive at your designated
size at creation, not after the
zsplit cannot do it. It requires the splitted size is at least the size
of the smallest of the archived files. I will have to search another
one ;-(
It wouldn't help you in any case.
Splitting binary files may create parts that are mis-classied as ascii/text.
You need to zip/gzip/bzip2
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 12:33:09 -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
On 8/11/2011 12:26 PM, Camaleón wrote:
zsplit cannot do it. It requires the splitted size is at least the
size of the smallest of the archived files. I will have to search
another one ;-(
zip -s SIZE should do the trick ... split the
On 8/11/2011 1:14 PM, Camaleón wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 12:33:09 -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
On 8/11/2011 12:26 PM, Camaleón wrote:
zsplit cannot do it. It requires the splitted size is at least the
size of the smallest of the archived files. I will have to search
another one ;-(
zip -s
Hi,
is there any way to avoid mutt to change the name of attachments I receive?
For instance, a pdf called documentación_1s_2011.pdf appears in my
message as =?ISO-8859-1?Q?documentaci=F3n=5F1s=5F20...
Thanks!
--
jm
On 27.07.11,09:52, Jose M Vidal wrote:
Hi,
is there any way to avoid mutt to change the name of attachments I receive?
For instance, a pdf called documentación_1s_2011.pdf appears in my
message as =?ISO-8859-1?Q?documentaci=F3n=5F1s=5F20...
Thanks!
Try to set this option in your ~/.muttrc
Yes!
set rfc2047_parameters=yes
Solved it, thanks.
--
jm
auto_view again.
Or view-attachments then tag-forward select parts.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
dear mutt users,
after using mutt for many years and after reading the manual
several times, I am still getting stuck with a few questions/
problems concerning attachments:
1. depending on some circumstances, I would like to
decide on the fly whether I would like to view
Hello Y z,
Am 2011-03-24 13:51:35, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
How do I get mutt (if it's really mutt) to not do this? The attachments are
preceded by:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=funding relief 10-23.pdf
Content-Transfer
Thanks!
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:37:49 +0100
From: linux4miche...@tamay-dogan.net
To: mutt-users@mutt.org
Subject: Re: Mutt trashing mime attachments
Hello Y z,
Am 2011-03-24 13:51:35, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
How do I get mutt (if it's
are inserted along the way, and apparently, it's done by mutt
(but I'm not really sure).
Attempts to purge the ^Ms with vi just make things worse (I guess Adobe needs
some of them):
http://38.119.130.12/ugly.pdf
How do I get mutt (if it's really mutt) to not do this? The attachments are
preceded
,
except that by the time it gets to the recipients it appears to be
double-spaced.
Is there any way that I can add a filter or something to strip CRs from
plain-text attachments?
--
.o. | Sterling (Chip) Camden | http://camdensoftware.com
..o | sterl...@camdensoftware.com | http
or something to strip CRs from
plain-text attachments?
--
.o. | Sterling (Chip) Camden | http://camdensoftware.com
..o | sterl...@camdensoftware.com | http://chipsquips.com
ooo | 2048D/3A978E4F | http://chipstips.com
--
Rudy Vener, Owner and founder
Pizza Galaxy
that be in addition to the 'normal' decoding which works with most
attachments? I.e. would everything that worked before continue to work
correctly?
Yes. The only thing that might break (and I'm not even sure it
would) is if someone sent you a file actually named something like
=?blah?Q?foo
hello all,
please skip this mail and excuse the noise if you hate slightly OT posts.
I recently got attachments which were really pdfs but couldn't be detected as
such because they had strange content-type names:
application/x-coremedia-dynamic
application/force-download
I wrote .mailcap
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 09:04:34AM +0100, Jan-Herbert Damm wrote:
hello all,
please skip this mail and excuse the noise if you hate slightly OT posts.
I recently got attachments which were really pdfs but couldn't be detected as
such because they had strange content-type names
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 11:06:52AM +, Chris G wrote:
I had something *vaguely* similar yesterday, a supplier sent me a note
about an order I had placed and it was:-
[-- application/octet-stream is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --]
... which is OK[ish], but the file name was:-
=yes
Would that be in addition to the 'normal' decoding which works with most
attachments? I.e. would everything that worked before continue to work
correctly?
I've argued before that Mutt should make that the default.
--
Chris Green
attachments? I.e. would everything that worked before continue to work
correctly?
Yes. The only thing that might break (and I'm not even sure it would)
is if someone sent you a file actually named something like
=?blah?Q?foo?. In other words, a legitimate file name that *looks*
like it's RFC2047
* Sebastian Tramp on Friday, January 21, 2011 at 02:00:54 +0100
is it possible to auto-remove attachments from my own mails after I've
sent them? I want to achive a behavior similar to alpines fcc does not
include attachments config option [1].
set fcc_attach=no
--
\black\trash movie _SAME
but will
try
to decrypt many types of attachments which are in fact not pgp encrypted.
The attachment should have type
application/pgp-encrypted
otherwise it needs to be fixed.
Richard
--
jm
Look at the mutt config here:
http://aperiodic.net/phil/configs/
Mostly look
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 12:44:27PM +0100, Jose M Vidal wrote:
What I am trying to do now is sending encrypted attachments instead of
encrypted e-mails. I installed Cryptophane in the Windows boxes and
all is ok, except my mutt is not recognizing .gpg attachments, and a
message of octet
at 12:44:27PM +0100, Jose M Vidal wrote:
What I am trying to do now is sending encrypted attachments instead of
encrypted e-mails. I installed Cryptophane in the Windows boxes and
all is ok, except my mutt is not recognizing .gpg attachments, and a
message of octet-stream/aplication
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:15:10PM +0100, Jose M Vidal wrote:
application/octet-stream; gpg %s
Now, If i try to open the file from mutt I am asked for my gpg
passphrase, and the file is decrypted in /tmp, which is not that bad.
Sorry for being unable to go further, but: how could the file
to decrypt many types of attachments which are in fact not pgp encrypted.
The attachment should have type
application/pgp-encrypted
otherwise it needs to be fixed.
Richard
None of the possibilities is actually working.
But at least I have clues enough to go deeper with .mailcap options,
which I clearly ned to learn,
Thanks again.
actually, forget my previous answer. It might work for this case but will try
to decrypt many types of attachments which are in fact
trying to do now is sending encrypted attachments instead of
encrypted e-mails. I installed Cryptophane in the Windows boxes and
all is ok, except my mutt is not recognizing .gpg attachments, and a
message of octet-stream/aplication is not supported is shown in
every message I receive
:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 08:42:05PM +0100, Jose M Vidal wrote:
Hi,
While opening and viewing mutt attachments, mutt is not available
until I close the attachment app (evince, chrome, etc)
Is there any way to open attachments while keeping the mutt terminal
available?
Thanks a lot!
I
I had to come back, because the kind solution provided by Syerling (
sleep n) was apparently working, but while viewing pdf documents, when
I was browsing to previous pages they turned blank.
So I decided to use the mutt_bgrun script, till I realize I ignore
where to save it and how to call
Quoth Jose M Vidal on Wednesday, 08 December 2010:
Hi,
I had to come back, because the kind solution provided by Syerling (
sleep n) was apparently working, but while viewing pdf documents, when
I was browsing to previous pages they turned blank.
So I decided to use the mutt_bgrun script,
201 - 300 of 918 matches
Mail list logo
