Hello
TL;DR
Has anyone managed to use ex in conjunction with display_filter?
I write emails using vim, which provides the handy function gggqG. This
function reformats text such that it doesn't exceed (say) 72 characters. The
function is superior to e.g.
$ fold -s -w 72 inputFile
because i
* On 31 Jan 2017, Andreas Doll wrote:
>
> I write emails using vim, which provides the handy function gggqG. This
> function reformats text such that it doesn't exceed (say) 72 characters. The
> function is superior to e.g.
>
> $ fold -s -w 72 inputFile
par is superior to all other text ref
* David Champion [01-31-17 19:31]:
> * On 31 Jan 2017, Andreas Doll wrote:
> >
> > I write emails using vim, which provides the handy function gggqG. This
> > function reformats text such that it doesn't exceed (say) 72 characters. The
> > function is superior to e.g.
> >
> > $ fold -s -w 7
* On 31 Jan 2017, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * David Champion [01-31-17 19:31]:
> > * On 31 Jan 2017, Andreas Doll wrote:
> > >
> > > I write emails using vim, which provides the handy function gggqG. This
> > > function reformats text such that it doesn't exceed (say) 72 characters.
> > > The
On 01.02.17 00:56, Andreas Doll wrote:
> TL;DR
> Has anyone managed to use ex in conjunction with display_filter?
>
>
> I write emails using vim, which provides the handy function gggqG. This
> function reformats text such that it doesn't exceed (say) 72 characters.
The ex exercise is intriguing
On 2017-01-31 at 16:26, David Champion wrote:
> par is superior to all other text reformatters.
Cool, I didn't knew about par. Indeed more powerful than vims reformatting.
> But to your question:
> The display filter is a filter in a strict sense: the message is send on
> its stdin, and its stdo
