When I press reply, I want to fork a new instance of mutt with
that new instance then executions the editor with the replied to
message and headers in place.
I would do this into another screen window ideally but others
might want to launch an xterm for this purpose.
The advantage is to have
Eric Smith wrote: [Fri Nov 21 2008, 04:46:01AM EST]
I would do this into another screen window ideally but others
might want to launch an xterm for this purpose.
I do this for new messages, replies, group-replies and
list-replies.
http://agriffis.n01se.net/skel.hg/index.cgi/file/tip/bin/xmutt
On 2008-11-21, Aron Griffis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Smith wrote: [Fri Nov 21 2008, 04:46:01AM EST]
I would do this into another screen window ideally but others
might want to launch an xterm for this purpose.
I do this for new messages, replies, group-replies and
list-replies.
Gary Johnson wrote: [Fri Nov 21 2008, 05:28:54PM EST]
Interesting. What do you about setting the 'r' flag for
messages to which you've replied?
I don't presently.
I played with a scheme similar to yours for a while, but
I didn't like that there was no way to automatically and
reliably set
Simon, et al --
...and then Simon White said...
%
% functionality retired in favour of good IMAP support and a HOWTO for
% fetchmail included in the Mutt distribution package?
Since mutt doesn't have the ability to send mail itself, but depends on
an MTA, I think it makes perfect sense to not
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-18 08.20 -0500]:
Since mutt doesn't have the ability to send mail itself, but depends on
an MTA, I think it makes perfect sense to not bother with receiving
mail itself, and I'm all for tossing out that chunk of code.
I second that.
[...snip...]
I
mutt has two varieties of pop support, and its not clear which (or
both) varieties you are talking about:
1 - The fetch-mail function
This doesn't seem enormously useful now that mutt has mailbox
support for pop://.
2 - browsing pop:// mailboxes
This is critical. I and others I know use mutt
Martin, et al --
...and then Martin Karlsson said...
%
% * David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-18 08.20 -0500]:
...
% bother with a sendmail HOWTO, but *perhaps* pointers to web sites for
...
%
% hmmm,
% just a quick thought: perhaps a pointer to an existing resource? Is
% there something
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 11:00:03AM -0400, Sam Roberts wrote:
2 - browsing pop:// mailboxes
This is critical. I and others I know use mutt on varieties of
machines, where we need to check our email online, and DON'T have
imap access. The ability to do a quick check of our mail, without
begin David T-G quotation:
I don't think we should bother with a fetchmail HOWTO just like we don't
bother with a sendmail HOWTO, but *perhaps* pointers to web sites for
fetchmail and getmail as well as sendmail, qmail, postfix, exim, ssmtp,
and maybe a few others (or maybe only one or
start to answer the first while recieving the last 400.
So my question, why don't we easily fork() this process ?
You probably want to install fetchmail instead of using Mutt's built in POP3
support. This will give you more flexibility, and allow you to download mail
in the background
17-Apr-02 at 10:23, Nico Schottelius ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
okay, this will be what I will do soon, but I am wondering why we shouldn't
allow mutt to fork out the pop process.
POP3 support seems to be more of an afterthought. Most people who use POP
to access their mailboxes swear
begin Simon White quotation:
Can you not just do
$ fetchmail (options)
$ mutt
Or, better:
fetchmail -d300
mutt
--
Shawn McMahon| McMahon's Laws of Linux support:
http://www.eiv.com | 1) There's more than one way to do it
AIM: spmcmahonfedex,
* Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-17 11:51:51 +0100]:
I think getmail does better than fetchmail if the network goes down
while it's polling the server: fetchmail has an annoying habit of
losing its fetchids when this happens, resulting in the delivery of
several hundred
while recieving the last 400.
So my question, why don't we easily fork() this process ?
Nico
--
Nico Schottelius
Please send your messages pgp-signed or pgp-encrypted.
If you don't know what pgp is visit www.gnupg.org.
(public pgp key: ftp.schottelius.org/pub/familiy/nico/pgp-key)
msg27193
my question, why don't we easily fork() this process ?
You probably want to install fetchmail instead of using Mutt's built in POP3
support. This will give you more flexibility, and allow you to download mail
in the background.
the last 400.
So my question, why don't we easily fork() this process ?
fetchmail is what you want for that.
--
Shawn McMahon| McMahon's Laws of Linux support:
http://www.eiv.com | 1) There's more than one way to do it
AIM: spmcmahonfedex, smcmahoneiv | 2) Somebody
hi,
(please cc replies to me, as i could not handle yet another busy list ;)
i've been using mutt for a while now. one thing that's always bugged me
(well, pretty much the only thing, now that i know about mime_forward),
is that there's no way that i can find to have a "compose" window as a
On 0, Gero Treuner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, Jul 18, 1999 at 08:41:11PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
when trying to download my POP mail, I get the message "ERR unable to fork"
Does anyone know what this means, how to fix it ?? I will not be able to
download a
Hi!
On Sun, Jul 18, 1999 at 08:41:11PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
when trying to download my POP mail, I get the message "ERR unable to fork"
Does anyone know what this means, how to fix it ?? I will not be able to
download any replies until I get this fixed, but will be
Hi,,
when trying to download my POP mail, I get the message "ERR unable to fork"
Does anyone know what this means, how to fix it ?? I will not be able to
download any replies until I get this fixed, but will be monitoring the
messages via the archives.
Thanks
--
Campaign for
21 matches
Mail list logo
