On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 09:41:11AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 11:39:13AM +0900, Kenichi Asai wrote:
For docx file, I think I have exactly the same thing:
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document;open -a
preview -n -W %s; nametemplate=
Thank you for this!This works beautifully for now, and I have made a list of my
browsers with it: w3m, dillo, midori, firefox and chromium in that order.
On Sunday, October 25, 2020, 7:57:09 PM CDT, raf wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 11:38:01PM +, Globe Trotter via Mutt-users
> I have the following set up in my .mailcap:
>
>text/html; w3m -I %{charset} -T text/html; copiousoutput
>
> so it converts things using w3m more or less okay, however, I
> am wondering is it possible to have an option for viewing using
> midori/firefox for the cases where w3m is not enough?
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 11:38:01PM +, Globe Trotter via Mutt-users
wrote:
> On Sunday, October 25, 2020, 5:53:20 PM CDT, raf wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 12:18:26AM +, Globe Trotter via Mutt-users
> wrote:
>
> > On Saturday, 24 October at 22:54, Mutt Users wrote:
> >
> > >>
On Sunday, October 25, 2020, 5:53:20 PM CDT, raf wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 12:18:26AM +, Globe Trotter via Mutt-users
wrote:
> On Saturday, 24 October at 22:54, Mutt Users wrote:
>
> >> Lots of people send me mail in HTML format (even though I do not like it).
> >> I h
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 12:18:26AM +, Globe Trotter via Mutt-users
wrote:
> On Saturday, 24 October at 22:54, Mutt Users wrote:
>
> >> Lots of people send me mail in HTML format (even though I do not like it).
> >> I have the following set up in my .mailcap:
> >> text/html; w3m -I %{charse
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 11:39:13AM +0900, Kenichi Asai wrote:
For docx file, I think I have exactly the same thing:
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document;open -a
preview -n -W %s; nametemplate=%s.docx
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessing
> text/html; mutt_bgrun /usr/bin/firefox %s >/dev/null 2>&1; needsterminal
> text/html; elinks -dump ; copiousoutput
This is almost what I am doing. However, it works for text/html but
not for docx file, apparently. For text/html, I have:
text/html; open -a safari -n -W %s; nametemplate=%s.htm
On Saturday, 24 October at 22:54, Mutt Users wrote:
>> Lots of people send me mail in HTML format (even though I do not like it). I
>> have the following set up in my .mailcap:
>> text/html; w3m -I %{charset} -T text/html; copiousoutput
>> so it converts things using w3m more or less okay, howeve
Hi,
On Saturday, 24 October at 22:54, Mutt Users wrote:
> Lots of people send me mail in HTML format (even though I do not like it). I
> have the following set up in my .mailcap:
>
> text/html; w3m -I %{charset} -T text/html; copiousoutput
>
> so it converts things using w3m more or less okay, h
On 24Oct2020 20:54, Globe Trotter via Mutt-users wrote:
>Lots of people send me mail in HTML format (even though I do not like it). I
>have the following set up in my .mailcap:
>
>text/html; w3m -I %{charset} -T text/html; copiousoutput
>
>so it converts things using w3m more or less okay, howeve
* mutt users list [10-24-20 16:54]:
> Lots of people send me mail in HTML format (even though I do not like
> it). I have the following set up in my .mailcap:
>
> text/html; w3m -I %{charset} -T text/html; copiousoutput
>
> so it converts things using w3m more or less okay, however, I am
> wond
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 08:54:18PM +, Globe Trotter via Mutt-users wrote:
Lots of people send me mail in HTML format (even though I do not like it). I
have the following set up in my .mailcap:
text/html; w3m -I %{charset} -T text/html; copiousoutput
so it converts things using w3m more or
Lots of people send me mail in HTML format (even though I do not like it). I
have the following set up in my .mailcap:
text/html; w3m -I %{charset} -T text/html; copiousoutput
so it converts things using w3m more or less okay, however, I am wondering is
it possible to have an option for viewing
On 08Sep2019 11:18, Marcelo Laia wrote:
However, some messages have html and a single and sort alternate text
plain said "your mailreader don't support html message". in this case, I need to hint
"v" and select alternate html and hint enter to read the message.
Yes, I get this rubbish all the
On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 11:18:08AM -0300, Marcelo Laia wrote:
> There are some alternative to tell mutt to read first text plain only
> if it is the full message? Ignoring text plain messages if it is short
> like "your mailreader don't support html message"?
I have seen this happen occasionally
On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 11:18:08AM -0300, Marcelo Laia wrote:
However, some messages have html and a single and sort alternate text
plain said "your mailreader don't support html message". in this case,
I need to hint "v" and select alternate html and hint enter to read the
message.
I have s
On 08/09/19 at 10:47, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Marcelo Laia [09-08-19 10:22]:
>
> I have following for quite some years and do not recall ever seeing "don't
> support html":
>
> mailcap:
> text/html; w3m -dump -v -F -T text/html %s; nametemplate=%s.html;
> needsterminal
> text/html; w3m
* Marcelo Laia [09-08-19 10:22]:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to read multpart (html and alternative text together) text/plain
> first.
>
> So, I set muttrc as follow:
>
> .mutt/muttrc
> auto_view text/html
> alternative_order text/plain text/html
>
> and mailcap as:
> .mutt/mailcap
> text/html; lyn
Hi,
I would like to read multpart (html and alternative text together) text/plain
first.
So, I set muttrc as follow:
.mutt/muttrc
auto_view text/html
alternative_order text/plain text/html
and mailcap as:
.mutt/mailcap
text/html; lynx -force_html -assume_charset=gbk -assume_local_charset=gbk /
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 07:50:36PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> Chris,
>
> Based on the excerpt you posted:
>
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 10:10:51PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > ...
> > ...
> > ...
> > Subject: Your order 3179771 is due for delivery by DHL Parcel UK
> > Content
Chris,
Based on the excerpt you posted:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 10:10:51PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> ...
> ...
> ...
> Subject: Your order 3179771 is due for delivery by DHL Parcel UK
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="--boundary_145134_db6b4c85-2
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 09:44:25AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 06Feb2019 13:01, Chris Green wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 01:00:48PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> > > Scenario B:
> > > If DHL really are sending HTML in a standalone text/plain body then
> > > you've got 2 choices.
> >
On 06Feb2019 13:01, Chris Green wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 01:00:48PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
Scenario B:
If DHL really are sending HTML in a standalone text/plain body then
you've got 2 choices.
The first is to act when you receive the email; if you're using procmail or
something
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 01:00:48PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 05Feb2019 22:10, Chris Green wrote:
> > I am getting notification E-Mails from DPD which aren't handled
> > correctly by 'auto_view text/html' in my muttrc and 'text/html; lynx
> > -dump %s; copiousoutput; nametemplate=%s.html'
On 05Feb2019 22:10, Chris Green wrote:
I am getting notification E-Mails from DPD which aren't handled
correctly by 'auto_view text/html' in my muttrc and 'text/html; lynx
-dump %s; copiousoutput; nametemplate=%s.html' in .mailcap.
Presumably it's simply that there is no 'text/html' string in t
I am getting notification E-Mails from DPD which aren't handled
correctly by 'auto_view text/html' in my muttrc and 'text/html; lynx
-dump %s; copiousoutput; nametemplate=%s.html' in .mailcap.
Presumably it's simply that there is no 'text/html' string in the
headers, I just get to see the raw HTML
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:38:14AM -0500, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 04:43:34PM -0500, Alan McConnell wrote:
> The point is to make Mutt wait to remove the file until some time after
> your browser is actually displaying it. Any time after that, Mutt can be
> allowed to continue
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 04:43:34PM -0500, Alan McConnell wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:53:20PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> > Incoming from Mark H. Wood:
> > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 09:28:05AM -0500, Alan McConnell wrote:
> > > > First, generically: I feel it is a source of difficulty that
>
Incoming from David Champion:
>
> It should be on the wiki.
Thanks for reminding me about the wiki.
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*) :(){ :|:& };:
- -
* On 25 Jan 2013, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> I see you posted an email about this back on December 19th too.
> Although I thought Patrick Shanahan explained it clearly then, and just
> now Mark H. Wood did again, I'll take a shot and try to (even) more
> verbosely explain what is going on and why
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 04:10:16PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> Alan McConnell wrote:
> > Re "Race Conditions". Unless I am mistaken, mutt is
> > written as a single, un-threaded process; I believe that
> > 'me' is (justly) proud of this achievement. So I do
> > not understand how "two proce
Incoming from Alan McConnell:
>
> My iceweasel(aka Firefox) runs, and displays in the
> middle of my screen, from the moment my computer is turned
Just a suggestion ... isolate the problem. Swap out firefox. In my
~/mutt/mailcap:
text/html; w3m -I %{charset} -T text/html -
Alan McConnell wrote:
> Re "Race Conditions". Unless I am mistaken, mutt is
> written as a single, un-threaded process; I believe that
> 'me' is (justly) proud of this achievement. So I do
> not understand how "two processes" can be involved here.
I see you posted an email about this back on Dec
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:53:20PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Mark H. Wood:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 09:28:05AM -0500, Alan McConnell wrote:
> > > First, generically: I feel it is a source of difficulty that
> > > mutt relies on two config files, .muttrc and .mailcap. Perhaps
> >
Incoming from Mark H. Wood:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 09:28:05AM -0500, Alan McConnell wrote:
> > First, generically: I feel it is a source of difficulty that
> > mutt relies on two config files, .muttrc and .mailcap. Perhaps
>
> .mailcap is a general-purpose configuration file for anything that
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:26:11PM -0500, Mark H. Wood wrote:
[cut]
> > Second(personal issue): I'm still having problems with
> > getting my html-mail to open(in a new tab) in my browser,
> > which is Firefox(Debianers call it iceweasel). Often,
> > when I use '
Lots of other tools also use .mailcap and /etc/mailcap.
This is why they are separate. One belongs to Mutt and the other
belongs to the world (including Mutt, which can use it).
> Second(personal issue): I'm still having problems with
> getting my html-mail to open(in a new tab) in
, personal, issue resolved.
Second(personal issue): I'm still having problems with
getting my html-mail to open(in a new tab) in my browser,
which is Firefox(Debianers call it iceweasel). Often,
when I use 'v' on an entry in my mutt display, and then
Arrow down to "
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 09:40:35PM -0600, Jim Graham wrote:
>> I 1 [multipa/alternativ, 7bit,
>> 13K]
>> I 2 ??> [text/plain, quoted,
>> utf-8, 1.6K]
>> I 3 ?>? [text/html, quoted,
>> utf-8, 11K]
>
>Just curious...
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:12:55PM -0500, Alan McConnell wrote:
>
> I call up mutt from one of my terms(URxvt) and it displays my
> E-mail from /var/spool/mail/alan, as is normal. With many
> of my mails I press 'v' to get a display like
>
> I 1 [multipa/alternativ, 7b
m loading page" with a display
>
> "File not found
> Iceweasel can't find the file at /home/alan/tmp/mutt.html."
>
> And this is true; there is nothing in my ~/tmp directory.
> But there is also nothing in my tmp/ directory when the html-mail
> opens successfu
lan/tmp/mutt.html."
[...]
I have a work-a-round(tm!) that I employ just for viewing html mail
because I have a somewhat convoluted setup. I maintain a tmux (similar to
screen) session containing a mutt instance from a remote computer where I
maintain my mail and web servers. Since the tmu
ere is nothing in my ~/tmp directory.
> > But there is also nothing in my tmp/ directory when the html-mail
> > opens successfully. The Tab says:
> > file:///home/alan/tmp/mutt.html
> > but there is nothing of that kind in my ~tmp/.
I am sorry, I miswrote. M
tt.html."
>
> And this is true; there is nothing in my ~/tmp directory.
> But there is also nothing in my tmp/ directory when the html-mail
> opens successfully. The Tab says:
> file:///home/alan/tmp/mutt.html
> but there is nothing of that kind in my ~tmp/.
>
> I suspe
ue; there is nothing in my ~/tmp directory.
But there is also nothing in my tmp/ directory when the html-mail
opens successfully. The Tab says:
file:///home/alan/tmp/mutt.html
but there is nothing of that kind in my ~tmp/.
I suspect that my ~/.mailcap file is not correct. I was given it
several
Quoth Nicolas Williams on Thursday, 09 December 2010:
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 07:25:11PM +0200, Amit Ramon wrote:
> > Nicolas Williams [2010-12-08 13:25 -0600]:
> >
> > >On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:17:02PM +0200, Amit Ramon wrote:
> > >>Chip Camden [2010-12-08 11:01 -0800]:
> > >>>On a related
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 07:25:11PM +0200, Amit Ramon wrote:
> Nicolas Williams [2010-12-08 13:25 -0600]:
>
> >On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:17:02PM +0200, Amit Ramon wrote:
> >>Chip Camden [2010-12-08 11:01 -0800]:
> >>>On a related topic, is there any way to get mutt to display RTL for
> >>>certai
Nicolas Williams [2010-12-08 13:25 -0600]:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:17:02PM +0200, Amit Ramon wrote:
Chip Camden [2010-12-08 11:01 -0800]:
>On a related topic, is there any way to get mutt to display RTL for
>certain characters? The Hebrew characters in your signature, for
>instance, are d
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 11:02:42AM -0800, Jason Helfman wrote:
>
> Hebrew is left to right. That is how it is supposed to be read as a
> language.
Where did you get that amazing piece of misinformation?
--
Bob Holtzman
Key ID: 8D549279
"If you think you're getting free lunch,
check the price o
Quoth Jason Helfman on Wednesday, 08 December 2010:
> >
> >On a related topic, is there any way to get mutt to display RTL for
> >certain characters? The Hebrew characters in your signature, for
> >instance, are displayed LTR in my mutt, so they read backwards.
>
> Hebrew is left to right. That i
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:17:02PM +0200, Amit Ramon wrote:
> Chip Camden [2010-12-08 11:01 -0800]:
> >On a related topic, is there any way to get mutt to display RTL for
> >certain characters? The Hebrew characters in your signature, for
> >instance, are displayed LTR in my mutt, so they read ba
Chip Camden [2010-12-08 11:01 -0800]:
On a related topic, is there any way to get mutt to display RTL for
certain characters? The Hebrew characters in your signature, for
instance, are displayed LTR in my mutt, so they read backwards.
Not directly. For that you have to use a bidi-aware termin
are no big fans of HTML mail, but I had some reasons
for developing this tool, as I shall explain now.
I'm using Mutt as my main mail reader/writer for a couple of years now
and am very pleased with it. My only problem was when communicating
with people who are using web-mail for reading their ma
Quoth Amit Ramon on Wednesday, 08 December 2010:
> Hello list,
>
> I'd like to announce a new tool that I developed that allows sending
> HTML-formatted mail from within Mutt. I know... being a Mutt's user
> already means we are no big fans of HTML mail, but I had some
Hello list,
I'd like to announce a new tool that I developed that allows sending
HTML-formatted mail from within Mutt. I know... being a Mutt's user
already means we are no big fans of HTML mail, but I had some reasons
for developing this tool, as I shall explain now.
I'm using
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009, lee wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 06:35:17PM +0800, bill lam wrote:
> > On Tue, 03 Nov 2009, lee wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've got an email with these headers:
> > >
> > >
> > > Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
> > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printa
On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 06:35:17PM +0800, bill lam wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Nov 2009, lee wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've got an email with these headers:
> >
> >
> > Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> > X-Spam_score: 4.4
> > X-Spam_score_int: 44
On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 06:12:14AM -0400, Monte Stevens wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 09:22:40PM -0700, lee wrote:
>
> > Well, I have set implicit_autoview. Even when I press 'v' to view the
> > attachments and then Enter to display it, I'm seeing the HTML source.
>
> A recent post from Martin
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009, lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got an email with these headers:
>
>
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> X-Spam_score: 4.4
> X-Spam_score_int: 44
> X-Spam_bar:
>
> "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitio
On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 09:22:40PM -0700, lee wrote:
> Well, I have set implicit_autoview. Even when I press 'v' to view the
> attachments and then Enter to display it, I'm seeing the HTML source.
A recent post from Martin Krafft describes a problem rendering html. It
sounds similar to yours; pe
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 12:01:31AM -0700, lee wrote:
> PS:
Why is the PS at the top?
> Mutt seems to ignore ~/.mailcap.
>
> l...@cat:~/Mail$ mutt -nF /dev/null -Q mailcap_path
> mailcap_path="~/.mailcap:/usr/share/mutt/mailcap:/etc/mailcap:/etc/mailcap:/usr/etc/mailcap:/usr/local/etc/mailcap"
>
PS:
Mutt seems to ignore ~/.mailcap.
l...@cat:~/Mail$ mutt -nF /dev/null -Q mailcap_path
mailcap_path="~/.mailcap:/usr/share/mutt/mailcap:/etc/mailcap:/etc/mailcap:/usr/etc/mailcap:/usr/local/etc/mailcap"
l...@cat:~/Mail$
So which of the mailcap files mutt finds in the mailcap_path will it
us
Hi,
I've got an email with these headers:
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam_score: 4.4
X-Spam_score_int: 44
X-Spam_bar:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";>
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="de" lang=
* Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 09 30, 02 at 20:56:
> * Sven Guckes said:
> > well, if you subscribe to a HTML-only newsletter
> > then you were asking for it - so it's your problem.
>
> * Michael Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 17:27]:
> > It's *not* a problem, for me, any
* Sven Guckes said:
> well, if you subscribe to a HTML-only newsletter
> then you were asking for it - so it's your problem.
* Michael Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 17:27]:
> It's *not* a problem, for me, anyway.
so you are ignoring the extra but superfluous data - fine.
> I know about
* Laurabelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 18:03]:
> Just my 2p - I use procmail recipes (and a couple of scripts) to strip
> HTML formatting from all legitimate email. The same scripts add a note
> to the effect that HTML has been removed; if I want to exchange email
> with that person again,
On Sep 26 2002, Sven Guckes shared a puddle of experience:
Just my 2p - I use procmail recipes (and a couple of scripts) to strip
HTML formatting from all legitimate email. The same scripts add a note
to the effect that HTML has been removed; if I want to exchange email
with that person again,
Sven Guckes said:
> * Mike Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 03:35]:
>> > > Actually, I've gotten many non-HTML spams, too.
>> > > And I get many valid HTML mail, both
>> > > newsletters and private correspondence.
>> > has the th
* Mike Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 03:35]:
> > > Actually, I've gotten many non-HTML spams, too.
> > > And I get many valid HTML mail, both
> > > newsletters and private correspondence.
> > has the thought ever struck you that it might be *
;February 1899" and
> > thought "what, they had the internet back *then*?"
>
> * Michael Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-25 18:37]:
> > Yes, but only teletype machines. :-)
>
> "he he"
>
> > Actually, I've gotten many non-HTML
Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-25 18:37]:
> Yes, but only teletype machines. :-)
"he he"
> Actually, I've gotten many non-HTML spams, too.
> And I get many valid HTML mail, both
> newsletters and private correspondence.
has the thought ever struck you tha
> they had the internet back *then*?"
Yes, but only teletype machines. :-)
Actually, I've gotten many non-HTML spams, too. And I get many valid HTML
mail, both newsletters and private correspondence.
--
PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
Member,
On Sep 25 2002, Erik Christiansen shared a puddle of experience:
> (Of the 2247 advertising spams I've received since February, 1899
>were html.)
Am I the only one who read that as "February 1899" and thought "what,
they had the internet back *then*?"
Laurabelle
--
ASCII silly question, get
happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
> > the tags faster?
>
> Deleting HTML mail unread. It's /much/ faster that way. Seriously;
> I've yet to receive a piece of HTML mail that was worth reading.
It's true! With procmail diverting html-only email t
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 03:36:49PM +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
> I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
> for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
> mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
> the tags faster?
let procmail kil
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Benjamin Pflugmann wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On Tue 2002-09-24 at 15:36:49 +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
> > I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
> > for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
> > mails that happen upon my inbox - what
Hello.
On Tue 2002-09-24 at 15:36:49 +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
> I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
> for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
> mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
> the tags faster?
Be sure to u
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Eric Smith wrote:
> bill luecke said:
> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 03:36:49PM +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
> >
> > I have the following line in my .mailcap
> >
> > text/html; unhtml ; copiousoutput
>
> good answer - apt-get install unhtml on debian
>
> But it is still almost a sec
bill luecke said:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 03:36:49PM +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
>
> I have the following line in my .mailcap
>
> text/html; unhtml ; copiousoutput
good answer - apt-get install unhtml on debian
But it is still almost a second delay.
I think i will try and kill this problem with
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 03:36:49PM +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
I have the following line in my .mailcap
text/html; unhtml ; copiousoutput
I think the unhtml website is at
http://www.econym.demon.co.uk/unhtml/
Then I view the mail as an attachment, and unhtml strips out the
tags. Seems instantan
* Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-24-02 08:54]:
> I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
> for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
> mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
> the tags faster?
I use:
text/html; w3m -F
* Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020924 15:36]:
> I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
> for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
> mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
> the tags faster?
Procmail
:0
*Content-type
* Eric "old fruit" Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-24 13:44]:
> I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait for
> `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html mails that
> happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip the tags faster?
well - do no
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Eric Smith wrote:
> I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
> for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
> mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
> the tags faster?
someone commented on "lynx -dump" r
Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
> for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
> mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
> the tags faster?
Deleting
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002, Eric Smith wrote:
> I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
> for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
> mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
> the tags faster?
Telling people not to send email as
I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
the tags faster?
--
Eric Smith
* Mike Arrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-13 10:36]:
> Having come from pine, I'm used to html mail being rendered
> by lynx or links or something automatically. When I view an
> html mail in Mutt, it says "[-- text/html is unsupported
> (use 'v' to view
* Mike Arrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-13 12:36]:
> Hello,
> Having come from pine, I'm used to html mail being rendered by
> lynx or links or something automatically. When I view an html mail in
> Mutt, it says "[-- text/html is unsupported (use '
13-May-02 at 06:35, Mike Arrison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Hello,
> Having come from pine, I'm used to html mail being rendered by
> lynx or links or something automatically. When I view an html mail in
> Mutt, it says "[-- text/html is unsupported (use
Hello,
Having come from pine, I'm used to html mail being rendered by
lynx or links or something automatically. When I view an html mail in
Mutt, it says "[-- text/html is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part)
--]". Is there something I can do to tell Mutt to
Quoting Ian Chilton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hello,
>
> Please reply direct to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I am trying to get HTML mails to display with links.
Ian,
I use links as my web browser as well and here is what I have in my
.mailcap :
text/html; links -dump %s; nametemplate=%s.html; copiouso
begin s. keeling quotation:
>
> spamcop's work, and hitting that last send reports bit. Spamcop works
> great, except lynx tends to be the only browser that works well with
> their web server (Opera 5.0 is awful with it; Netscape is better; w3m
I have found the same thing; I just use Lynx via
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-13-02 00:37]:
> Alas! Patrick spake thus:
> > > I love dillo, it's so freaking fast. All it needs is just a few more
> > > features (like ftp support and bookmark heirarchies), and it'll replace
> > > Mozilla on my computer ;)
> >
> > You would probably
--CdrF4e02JqNVZeln
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Patrick spake thus:
> > I love dillo, it's so freaking fast. All it needs is just a few more
> > features (like ftp support and bookmark heirarchies), and i
Hello --
...and then s. keeling said...
%
...
%
% One of the things driving this is I'd like to find a way to easily
I think I've pretty much solved this wrinkle. Assuming you've gone to
get a spamcop mail reporting ID, then you might find
[zero] [11:59pm] ~> grep spam .mutt/muttrc | cat
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-12-02 22:32]:
> Alas! Patrick spake thus:
> > I use a small footprint limited feature web browser called dillo for
> > this final action to spamcop. Works great and is very small and quick.
> > It is available at: sourceforge.netprojects/dillo/
>
> I l
--KsGdsel6WgEHnImy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Patrick spake thus:
> I use a small footprint limited feature web browser called dillo for
> this final action to spamcop. Works great and is very small an
* s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-12-02 19:46]:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 08:27:21PM -0400, Shawn McMahon wrote:
> > begin s. keeling quotation:
> > >
> > > One of the things driving this is I'd like to find a way to easily
> > > report spam to spamcop, which means I have to pass an ID and pa
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
