lbdb & m_gpg

2000-08-25 Thread David T-G
Hi, folks -- More of the same here. It seems that m_gpg doesn't give me back all of the entries, which means so far that I don't get the ones I want! I have a number of keys (7 or 8), and lbdbq only returns three. A simpler case might be to try that of my pal Jim, whose old and new keys I have

Re: lbdb & m_gpg

2000-08-25 Thread David T-G
Hi again! ...and then David @ BigFoot said... % Hi, folks -- % % More of the same here. It seems that m_gpg doesn't give me back all of In fact, it seems on second look that m_gpg *does* give me all of my entries. Further digging reveals that both key addresses end up in $collection after lbd

Re: lbdb & m_gpg

2000-08-25 Thread Jason Helfman
I have no problems, i don't see how this all is happening. It was pretty p`n`p for me.. I suggest using the global file. For some reason there were issues with the installation taking my home directory settings. On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 01:33:39PM -0400, David T-G muttered: | Hi again! | | ...an

Re: lbdb & m_gpg

2000-08-25 Thread David T-G
Jason -- ...and then Jason Helfman said... % I have no problems, i don't see how this all is happening. It was pretty % p`n`p for me.. Well, that's good. Do you have multiple keys with the same address in your GPG keyring? If not, can I send you a couple so that you can see what you get? %

Re: lbdb & m_gpg

2000-08-25 Thread Jason Helfman
I have multiple keys for Roland. It comes up fine. On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 02:07:45PM -0400, David T-G muttered: | Jason -- | | ...and then Jason Helfman said... | % I have no problems, i don't see how this all is happening. It was pretty | % p`n`p for me.. | | Well, that's good. Do you have m

Re: lbdb & m_gpg

2000-08-25 Thread Roland Rosenfeld
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, David T-G wrote: > pub 1024D/AFEFC23B 2000-06-29 jimh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > pub 1024D/401A068F 1998-09-03 PHXMGNT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I did my same trick of commenting out the greps and seds, and this > time the "problem" showed up at only the second line. > In fac

Re: lbdb & m_gpg

2000-08-25 Thread Dave Pearson
On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 01:21:00PM -0400, David T-G wrote: > pub 1024D/AFEFC23B 2000-06-29 jimh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > sub 4096g/ED49589E 2000-06-29 > > pub 1024D/401A068F 1998-09-03 PHXMGNT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > sub 2048g/12BE4CB3 1998-09-03 > > (to set the stage). Running lbdbq usi

Re: lbdb & m_gpg

2000-08-27 Thread David T-G
Roland and Dave -- ...and then Roland Rosenfeld said... % On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, David T-G wrote: % % > $collection after lbdbq calls m_gpg_query and that they get stripped % > by munge and munge-keeporder. % % That's the point. Gotcha. % % > I'm not exactly sure what's going on in munge-keep