I must be slow or something but here is 6.3.6 from the documentation.
It only states addresses as alternates. I really do not want to debate
what the definition of an "alternate" is but it's the same as
an "alternative" or not the original. Thus, not the original which would
be referring to your
Corey G. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 23 May 2000:
I must be slow or something but here is 6.3.6 from the documentation.
It only states addresses as alternates.
The name is not accurate, and the description isn't either... I would
guess the name is some historical issue or something,
Corey G.:
I would be more than happy to write a better explanation if someone
really wants me to for the documentation. I only want to make Mutt
better like everyone else.
sounds great! i vote ``yes'' both for the effort and the offer.
thanks Corey!
--
clemens
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 07:23:30PM -0500, Corey G. wrote:
I must be slow or something but here is 6.3.6 from the documentation.
It only states addresses as alternates. I really do not want to debate
what the definition of an "alternate" is but it's the same as
an "alternative" or not the
I have unset metoo in the .muttrc but when I reply to a message it still
persists on including myself if I was in the original "To:". At this
point I am wondering how Mutt knows what my address really is because
it's not defined in .muttrc.
Am I missing something easy here?
Thanks,
--
Best
Corey G. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 22 May 2000:
I have unset metoo in the .muttrc but when I reply to a message it still
persists on including myself if I was in the original "To:". At this
point I am wondering how Mutt knows what my address really is because
it's not defined in
Hi Corey!
On Mon, 22 May 2000, Corey G. wrote:
I have unset metoo in the .muttrc but when I reply to a message it still
persists on including myself if I was in the original "To:". At this
point I am wondering how Mutt knows what my address really is because
it's not defined in .muttrc.
