Andreas --
...and then Andreas Herceg said...
%
% On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 08:11:18PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% |
% | No, X-* is for defining your own headers, and there is no end to the list
% | of them :-)
%
% That is exactly what I thought.
%
% | It's simply that mutt specifically recognize
Andreas Herceg wrote:
> OK, I did not know that X-Label is that common. Now I thought
> of just defining 'X-Coprija: coprija'.
>
> Now I would like to know if this would be against some standard
> which I do not know.
Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> replied:
> my understanding is that X headers
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 08:11:18PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
| Andreas --
|
| ...and then Andreas Herceg said...
| %
| % OK, I did not know that X-Label is that common. Now I thought of just
| % defining 'X-Coprija: coprija'.
|
| If you were triggering something in mutt instead of in procmail the
Will, et al --
...and then Will Yardley said...
%
% David T-G wrote:
% >
% > Sure. One could say the same thing about just about any header.
% > Maybe I'd want to use the References: header for notes about where I
% > did my research on this particular email. Then there's always the
% > Messa
David T-G wrote:
>
> Sure. One could say the same thing about just about any header.
> Maybe I'd want to use the References: header for notes about where I
> did my research on this particular email. Then there's always the
> Message-ID: games you can play, too.
the difference being that these
Will, et al --
...and then Will Yardley said...
%
% Andreas Herceg wrote:
% >
% > OK, I did not know that X-Label is that common. Now I thought of just
% > defining 'X-Coprija: coprija'.
% >
% > Now I would like to know if this would be against some standard which I
% > do not know.
%
% my un
Andreas --
...and then Andreas Herceg said...
%
% On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 10:04:37AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% |
% | ...and then Andreas Herceg said...
% | %
% | % On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 02:10:09AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% | % |
% | % | ...and then Andreas Herceg said...
% | % | %
% | ...
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 02:18:59PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
| Andreas Herceg wrote:
| >
| > OK, I did not know that X-Label is that common. Now I thought of just
| > defining 'X-Coprija: coprija'.
| >
| > Now I would like to know if this would be against some standard which I
| > do not know.
Andreas Herceg wrote:
>
> OK, I did not know that X-Label is that common. Now I thought of just
> defining 'X-Coprija: coprija'.
>
> Now I would like to know if this would be against some standard which I
> do not know.
my understanding is that X headers are pretty much up for grabs.
i say if
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 10:04:37AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
| Andreas --
|
| ...and then Andreas Herceg said...
| %
| % On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 02:10:09AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
| % |
| % | ...and then Andreas Herceg said...
| % | %
| ...
| % | % my_hdr X-Label: coprija
| % |
| % | Gaack! Th
Andreas --
...and then Andreas Herceg said...
%
% On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 02:10:09AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% |
% | ...and then Andreas Herceg said...
% | %
...
% | % my_hdr X-Label: coprija
% | %
% | % I wanted to achieve that outgoing messages are sent to my alternate
% | % address which I
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 02:10:09AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
| Andreas --
|
| ...and then Andreas Herceg said...
| %
| % Hello,
|
| Hi!
|
| % in my .muttrc I have included the lines
| %
| % my_hdr Bcc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| % my_hdr X-Label: coprija
| %
| % I wanted to achieve that outgoing mess
Magnus --
...and then Magnus Bodin said...
%
...
% To clearify: Is there anyway besides Header-edit to modify the X-Label?
% I mean; I know of the %y %Y -stuff, but I wondered about manual or
% macroscripted editing.
Ah, yes. You want the xlabel extensions patch; that provides a label
editor
Magnus --
...and then Magnus Bodin said...
%
% On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 02:10:09AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% > >
% > > I wanted to achieve that outgoing messages are sent to my alternate
% > > address which I use at work. There I use the X-Label entry to filter
% > > the mails with procmail and
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 08:19:40AM +0100, Magnus Bodin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 02:10:09AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> > >
> > > I wanted to achieve that outgoing messages are sent to my alternate
> > > address which I use at work. There I use the X-Label entry to filter
> > > the mails wit
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 02:10:09AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> >
> > I wanted to achieve that outgoing messages are sent to my alternate
> > address which I use at work. There I use the X-Label entry to filter
> > the mails with procmail and move them to a seperate folder.
>
> Gaack! That means t
Andreas --
...and then Andreas Herceg said...
%
% Hello,
Hi!
%
% in my .muttrc I have included the lines
%
% my_hdr Bcc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
% my_hdr X-Label: coprija
%
% I wanted to achieve that outgoing messages are sent to my alternate
% address which I use at work. There I use the X-Labe
Hello,
in my .muttrc I have included the lines
my_hdr Bcc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
my_hdr X-Label: coprija
I wanted to achieve that outgoing messages are sent to my alternate
address which I use at work. There I use the X-Label entry to filter the
mails with procmail and move them to a seperate folde
18 matches
Mail list logo
