Re: pgp_create_traditional in 1.5.0

2002-04-02 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what Thomas Roessler said on Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 05:59:32PM +0200: OpenPGP specifies application/pgp, but that breaks some MUAs that don't follow the OpenPGP RFC. Where does the OpenPGP RFC specify that? Sorry, I mispoke; it was another standard that specified that, and it

Re: pgp_create_traditional in 1.5.0

2002-03-27 Thread David T-G
Will -- ...and then Will Yardley said... % % -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- % Hash: SHA1 % % for those not on the mutt dev list, pgp_create_traditional works again % in 1.5.0 (cvs version - a patch from Armin Wolfermann), and the behavior Yay. That's always nice. % has been changed so

Re: pgp_create_traditional in 1.5.0

2002-03-27 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what David T-G said on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 07:55:08AM -0500: % has been changed so that application/pgp is no longer used (although % there's an x-mutt-action=pgp-sign flag in the content/type so that mutt % knows it's signed). those changes are from Thomas Roessler. I

Re: pgp_create_traditional in 1.5.0

2002-03-27 Thread David T-G
Shawn -- ...and then Shawn McMahon said... % % begin quoting what David T-G said on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 07:55:08AM -0500: % % % has been changed so that application/pgp is no longer used (although % % there's an x-mutt-action=pgp-sign flag in the content/type so that mutt % % knows it's

pgp_create_traditional in 1.5.0

2002-03-26 Thread Will Yardley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 for those not on the mutt dev list, pgp_create_traditional works again in 1.5.0 (cvs version - a patch from Armin Wolfermann), and the behavior has been changed so that application/pgp is no longer used (although there's an x-mutt-action=pgp-sign