Re: *argh* - html-mails (war: Re: problem with mutt/mailcap)

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Mark Bainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But, put this script somewhere where procmail can call it, and pipe all > html-mail through it before delivery. I don't know; removing tags might destroy some important part of the message. I think the best solution would be a filter that changes text/

Re: *argh* - html-mails (war: Re: problem with mutt/mailcap)

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=uAY1Vrrb3oVaqxed; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"

*argh* - html-mails (war: Re: problem with mutt/mailcap)

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Lars Hecking hat ueber "Re: problem with mutt/mailcap" geschrieben: > > But now I get all mails from OE-users, they send each message in > > "text" and "text/html". > > Well, they're bloody lusers and should be asked (kindly ...) to

Re: problem with mutt/mailcap

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
David DeSimone hat ueber "Re: problem with mutt/mailcap" geschrieben: > There is a command "alternative_order" that you can use to tell Mutt > which formats it should prefer to show you. I've chosen this: > > alternative_order text/enriched text/pl

Re: problem with mutt/mailcap

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Hi All, > There is a command "alternative_order" that you can use to tell Mutt > which formats it should prefer to show you. I've chosen this: > > alternative_order text/enriched text/plain text/html > > So in this scheme, text/plain is preferred over text/html. Yes I tripped over thi

Re: problem with mutt/mailcap

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Michael Thies writes: > Ronny Haryanto hat ueber "Re: problem with mutt/mailcap" geschrieben: > > > text/html; lynx -dump %s ; nametemplate=%s.html ; copiousoutput > > > > text/html; lynx -force_html -dump %s ; copiousoutput > > It's nice, but

Re: problem with mutt/mailcap

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Michael Thies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > text/html; lynx -force_html -dump %s ; copiousoutput > > It's nice, but I would like to get this only working, if the text/html > is the only or first part of the mail. It depends on how the message is formatted. > But now I get all mails from OE-u

Re: problem with mutt/mailcap

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Ronny Haryanto hat ueber "Re: problem with mutt/mailcap" geschrieben: > > text/html; lynx -dump %s ; nametemplate=%s.html ; copiousoutput > > text/html; lynx -force_html -dump %s ; copiousoutput It's nice, but I would like to get this only working, if the tex

Re: problem with mutt/mailcap

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
On 23-Jun-1999, David Shaw wrote: > > and the following in my ~/.mailcap: > > text/html; lynx -force_html %s; needsterminal; > > However, when I open a message that has html content attached, I get: > > mailcap entry for type text/html not found > > Try: > text/html; lynx -dump %s ;

Re: problem with mutt/mailcap]

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
On Wednesday, 23 June 1999 at 18:04, Todd Fleisher wrote: > I believe that this is a mailcap issue rather than a mutt one, but I > am stumped none the less. I am trying to autoview text/html so I have > in my .muttrc: > auto_view text/richtext text/html > and the following in my ~/.mailcap:

Re: problem with mutt/mailcap]

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
On Wed, Jun 23, 1999 at 06:04:09PM -0400, Todd Fleisher wrote: > I believe that this is a mailcap issue rather than a mutt one, but I > am stumped none the less. I am trying to autoview text/html so I have > in my .muttrc: > auto_view text/richtext text/html > and the following in my ~/.mail

problem with mutt/mailcap]

1999-06-23 Thread Todd Fleisher
I believe that this is a mailcap issue rather than a mutt one, but I am stumped none the less. I am trying to autoview text/html so I have in my .muttrc: auto_view text/richtext text/html and the following in my ~/.mailcap: text/html; lynx -force_html %s; needsterminal; However, w