When sending an email through a remote smtp server, the status bar goes
through it's sending process, like:
Sending...
Looking up etc...
Connecting etc...
SSL/TLS etc...
Authenticating LOGIN etc...
Is there any way to background this ? Something like sendmail_wait=-1,
but for smtp ? Waiting for
On 17 May 2008 16:53 +1200, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dylan Stamat):
> Is there any way to background this ? Something like sendmail_wait=-1,
> but for smtp ? Waiting for mail to send can be time consuming.
It's not exactly what you are looking for but what I have done is to
set up a minimal MTA on
On 05/17/08 16:53, Dylan Stamat wrote:
>
> Is there any way to background this ? Something like sendmail_wait=-1,
> but for smtp ? Waiting for mail to send can be time consuming.
I'm not sure if I understand correctly, but use msmtp to send through
an SMTP server of my ISP using
set sendmail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, May 17 at 04:53 PM, quoth Dylan Stamat:
>When sending an email through a remote smtp server, the status bar goes
>through it's sending process, like:
>
>Sending...
>Looking up etc...
>Connecting etc...
>SSL/TLS etc...
>Authenticating LOGIN
0n Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:01:38PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
>Yes and no. Mutt is not multithreaded, so you can't have it handle the
>SMTP connection in the background, so, NO. But if you really want it
>backgrounded, why not use a simple SMTP sender (like msmtp or
>nullm
* Wilkinson, Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-18-2008]:
> 0n Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:01:38PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
>
> >Yes and no. Mutt is not multithreaded, so you can't have it handle the
> >SMTP connection in the background, so, NO. But if you really want it
> >backgrounde
Marianne, thank you very much for the links, and everybody else
for the suggestions. Had no idea that Mutt wasn't multithreaded.
Using a local MTA is the ticket :)
Thanks !
==
Dylan
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 3:37 AM, Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Wilkinson, Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
