El día 02/May/2000, Claus Assmann escribía:
> > Uh, right now this is a SUSE box with sendmail. I fiddled with sendmail.cf
> > and filled in the correct masquerading stuff. Sendmail sucks. Big time.
>
> Yeah, if you "fiddled with sendmail.cf"...
> It requires two lines in your .mc file:
> MASQUE
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 09:33:31PM +0200, cFischer wrote:
> i'm puzzled: why's qmail with 232k only about 1/3rd the size of postfix?
> ah well and anyhow: a aint got the space, so's gonna be qmail 4 me!
> thanks again for the info.
Try stripping the binaries and/or build dynamically linked bin
2000-05-03-15:33:31 cFischer:
> i'm puzzled: why's qmail with 232k only about 1/3rd the size of
> postfix?
I'm too lazy to download qmail to confirm this guess, but I'm
strongly inclined to bet that the answer is: documentation. Postfix
is very very richly internally documented.
> ah well and an
On Wed 03.0500-13:21, Bennett Todd wrote:
> But both Postfix and qmail are very fast and reliable and secure,
> and they're both enormously simpler to configure and maintain than
> sendmail. I'd definitely recommend removing sendmail nearly
> everywhere. There are occasional jobs that sendmail can
2000-05-03-10:50:35 cFischer:
> On Wed 03.0500-08:18, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > You didn't try postfix.
>
> no. did you? is it big 'n nasty?
Nope. Postfix is not big or nasty. It is, by design: simple to
install, configure, and maintain; fast; secure; and as compatible
with sendmail as neede
Le Wed, May 03, 2000 at 04:50:35PM +0200, cFischer a écrit:
> > You didn't try postfix.
>
> no. did you? is it big 'n nasty?
I did. It's small 'n beautiful.
Arnaud.
PGP signature
On Wed 03.0500-08:18, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> You didn't try postfix.
no. did you? is it big 'n nasty?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 02:20:44AM +0200, cFischer muttered:
> On Tue-02.05.00-16:34, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > After getting a little more familar with how things are done in SUSE I
> > tweaked the "correct" config files. Anyway, right now I'm just too lazy to
> > throw away sendmail :)
>
> an
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 09:09:00AM +0200, Frank Derichsweiler wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 02:20:44AM +0200, cFischer wrote:
> > > tweaked the "correct" config files. Anyway, right now I'm just too lazy to
> > > throw away sendmail :)
>
> > that is, i tried smail. easy to configure and much
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 02:20:44AM +0200, cFischer wrote:
> > tweaked the "correct" config files. Anyway, right now I'm just too lazy to
> > throw away sendmail :)
> that is, i tried smail. easy to configure and much leaner than sendmail.
IMHO you should forget sendmail and use qmail.
* Works *
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 02:20:44AM +0200, cFischer wrote:
> and you shouldn't. i tried them all, only to come back to trusty sendmail.
You didn't try postfix.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb
"Don't let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 11:28:26AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> My problem: The envelope from is set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I already tried to
>
> set hostname = "innominate.de"
>
> but to no avail. How can I specify which envelope from mutt should use when
> talking to my local sendmail?
>
On Tue-02.05.00-05:27, Claus Assmann wrote:
> Yeah, if you "fiddled with sendmail.cf"...
> It requires two lines in your .mc file:
> MASQUERADE_AS(`host.domain')
> FEATURE(`masquerade_envelope')
how can you say such an ugly thing? there were times when i had m4 and
sendmail, but none of the conf
On Tue-02.05.00-16:34, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> After getting a little more familar with how things are done in SUSE I
> tweaked the "correct" config files. Anyway, right now I'm just too lazy to
> throw away sendmail :)
and you shouldn't. i tried them all, only to come back to trusty sendmail.
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 05:27:35AM -0700, Claus Assmann wrote:
> > Uh, right now this is a SUSE box with sendmail. I fiddled with sendmail.cf
> > and filled in the correct masquerading stuff. Sendmail sucks. Big time.
>
> Yeah, if you "fiddled with sendmail.cf"...
> It requires two lines in your
On Tue, May 02, 2000, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Uh, right now this is a SUSE box with sendmail. I fiddled with sendmail.cf
> and filled in the correct masquerading stuff. Sendmail sucks. Big time.
Yeah, if you "fiddled with sendmail.cf"...
It requires two lines in your .mc file:
MASQUERADE_AS(`h
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 12:37:25PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > my_hdr From: Lutz Jaenicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This is not the envelope from...
But it gets derived from that. Anyway, the reason why that didn't work was
because I set my_hdr From: from within a send-hook only...
> Uh
On 2000-05-02 12:37:25 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Uh, right now this is a SUSE box with sendmail. I
> fiddled with sendmail.cf and filled in the correct
> masquerading stuff. Sendmail sucks. Big time.
Hey, when fiddling with the sendmail.cf is an option,
switching to your favorite MTA may
On 2000-05-02 11:28:26 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> set hostname = "innominate.de"
> but to no avail. How can I specify which envelope from
> mutt should use when talking to my local sendmail?
envelope_from
Type: boolean
Default: no
When set, mutt will tr
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 11:46:12AM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
> Specify your "From" address with the
> my_hdr From: Lutz Jaenicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This is not the envelope from...
> setting or fix the local MTA on proto.bln.innominate.de to generate a
> valid from address when none is gi
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 11:28:26AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> My problem: The envelope from is set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I already tried to
>
> set hostname = "innominate.de"
>
> but to no avail. How can I specify which envelope from mutt should use
> when talking to my local sendmail?
t
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 11:28:26AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> My problem: The envelope from is set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I already tried to
>
> set hostname = "innominate.de"
>
> but to no avail. How can I specify which envelope from mutt should use when
> talking to my local sendmail?
m
My problem: The envelope from is set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I already tried to
set hostname = "innominate.de"
but to no avail. How can I specify which envelope from mutt should use when
talking to my local sendmail?
Transcript of session follows.
Out: 220 stahlw06.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de ESMTP Postf
23 matches
Mail list logo
