Re: Sorting by threads

2008-03-15 Thread Chris Bannister
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 01:11:26PM +0200, Pavel Gulchouck wrote: > Hello, > > has mutt a possibility to sort mailbox by threads using date > of newest message in each thread, but not oldest as sort key? > If yes, how can I setup it? > If no, this is a feature request. :) Your version of mutt is o

Re: Sorting by threads

2008-03-14 Thread Dilip M
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 4:41 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > has mutt a possibility to sort mailbox by threads using date of newest > message in each thread, but not oldest as sort key? If yes, how can I > setup it? If no, this is a feature request. :) Set the below variables in ~/.muttrc.

Sorting by threads

2008-03-14 Thread Pavel Gulchouck
Hello, has mutt a possibility to sort mailbox by threads using date of newest message in each thread, but not oldest as sort key? If yes, how can I setup it? If no, this is a feature request. :) Thanks. -- Pavel

Re: sorting by threads

2000-11-10 Thread Wouter Verheijen
I wrote a line for the manual to make this clear(er) for new users. (or should manual patches be submitted elsewhere?) -- Wouter Verheijen [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- manual.txt Mon Oct 16 16:24:47 2000 +++ manualupd.txt Fri Nov 10 14:35:04 2000 @@ -1151,6 +1151,10 @@ folder-hook

Re: sorting by threads

2000-11-09 Thread Harold Oga
On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 12:49:57AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: >Wouter Verheijen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 09 Nov 2000: >> It is not mentioned in the documentation that this order is important. >> Maybe this should be added? > >Well, order is significant for more or less all hooks. I don

Re: sorting by threads

2000-11-09 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Wouter Verheijen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 09 Nov 2000: > It is not mentioned in the documentation that this order is important. > Maybe this should be added? Well, order is significant for more or less all hooks. I don't remember if this is stated anywhere in the manual specifically, if

Re: sorting by threads

2000-11-09 Thread Ben Reser
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 11:02:18PM +0100, Wouter Verheijen wrote: > Right! This was exactly what I had. Thanks. > I assumed that the dot was just the default, which gets executed when > there was no other match. > It is not mentioned in the documentation that this order is important. > Maybe this

Re: sorting by threads

2000-11-09 Thread Wouter Verheijen
i> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 01:26:17PM -0800 On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 01:26:17PM -0800, Ben Reser wrote: > I

Re: sorting by threads

2000-11-09 Thread Ben Reser
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 09:31:09PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > Well, the hook is executing, if you get the error. > I would try what was suggested in the other mail, create a minimal > .muttrc and try to get it work with that. Yes the hook is executing. But I'm guessing he has another hook th

Re: sorting by threads

2000-11-09 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Wouter Verheijen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 09 Nov 2000: > > folder-hook . set sort=threads > No, this doesn't work either. It simply doesn't match, although > putting some garbage (like folder-hook . set asdf) gives me an error > message. > It looks like the sort command doesn't do anyth

Re: sorting by threads

2000-11-09 Thread Michael Tatge
Wouter Verheijen muttered: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 07:13:55PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > > Can you get any folder-hooks to execute at all? Does > > > > folder-hook . set sort=threads > No, this doesn't work either. It simply doesn't match, although > putting some garbage (like folder-hoo

Re: sorting by threads

2000-11-09 Thread Wouter Verheijen
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 07:13:55PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > Can you get any folder-hooks to execute at all? Does > > folder-hook . set sort=threads No, this doesn't work either. It simply doesn't match, although putting some garbage (like folder-hook . set asdf) gives me an error message

Re: sorting by threads

2000-11-09 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Wouter Verheijen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 08 Nov 2000: > I haven't specified $folder at all in my muttrc, so it defaults to > ~/Mail. I tried removing the `=' but without success. > Nasty thing it is... Hmm, ok. Strange. Can you get any folder-hooks to execute at all? Does folder-h

Re: sorting by threads

2000-11-09 Thread Wouter Verheijen
I haven't specified $folder at all in my muttrc, so it defaults to ~/Mail. I tried removing the `=' but without success. Nasty thing it is... -- Wouter Verheijen [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: sorting by threads

2000-11-07 Thread Michael Tatge
Mikko Hänninen muttered: > If that doesn't help, you might just want to try "folder-hook mutt", > without the =. Of course that has the drawback that it would also > match "mutt-dev", in fact anything with "mutt" in the name. =mutt matches mutt-dev, too. If fact it matches every string with has

Re: sorting by threads

2000-11-07 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Wouter Verheijen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 07 Nov 2000: > folder-hook =mutt set sort=threads > > but it just doesn't work. One thing to check is that you specify $folder *before* this, and that you don't change it afterwards... The = is expanded when the command is seen, and if you chan

sorting by threads

2000-11-07 Thread Wouter Verheijen
Hi, I have this in my .muttrc: folder-hook =mutt set sort=threads but it just doesn't work. I tried some other things with quotation and the like, but mutt doesn't thread this folder automatically. I'm using Mutt 1.2.5. Thanks! -- Wouter Verheijen [EMAIL PROTECTED]