28/11/20 12:06 ನಲ್ಲಿ, Ming ಬರೆದರು:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 03:04:16AM +, ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote:
> > 28/11/20 10:33 ನಲ್ಲಿ, Ming ಬರೆದರು:
> > > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 01:26:06PM +, ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote:
> > > > Testing updated record :P
> > > >
On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 03:04:16AM +, ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote:
> 28/11/20 10:33 ನಲ್ಲಿ, Ming ಬರೆದರು:
> > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 01:26:06PM +, ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote:
> > > Testing updated record :P
> > >
> > > By the way, if anyone has a better
28/11/20 10:33 ನಲ್ಲಿ, Ming ಬರೆದರು:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 01:26:06PM +, ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote:
> > Testing updated record :P
> >
> > By the way, if anyone has a better way of testing whether an SPF record is
> > working correctly, please let me know! I don't r
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 01:26:06PM +, ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote:
> Testing updated record :P
>
> By the way, if anyone has a better way of testing whether an SPF record is
> working correctly, please let me know! I don't really want to spam the list
> with these kinds of email
Testing updated record :P
By the way, if anyone has a better way of testing whether an SPF record is
working correctly, please let me know! I don't really want to spam the list
with these kinds of emails unless I have to, although I *think* this should
work.
26/11/20 18:14 ನಲ್ಲಿ, ಚಿರಾಗ್
Please ignore. I'm trying to see whether I get tons of DMARC reports after I
updated my SPF record on my domain.
publickey - mailinglist@chiraag.me - b0c8d720.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 06:38:13PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> The 1.11 release is coming up in about three weeks. This time I'm
> trying something different and have prepared a BETA tarball to get
> testing/feedback in advance. The translation files haven
Hi Everyone,
The 1.11 release is coming up in about three weeks. This time I'm
trying something different and have prepared a BETA tarball to get
testing/feedback in advance. The translation files haven't been updated
yet, but the tarball is at: .
The long list of changes is at the bottom
* munk [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-13 20:03]:
Is there a test mailing list I can use to check
I have various settings in mutt setup correctly?
www.yahoogroups.com - hint hint!
Sven
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 03:20:34AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
* munk [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-13 20:03]:
Is there a test mailing list I can use to check
I have various settings in mutt setup correctly?
www.yahoogroups.com - hint hint!
Sven
memeep, thanx sven :)
Main reason was to
Hi,
Is there a test mailing list I can use to check I have various settings in mutt setup
correctly?
Thanks in advance,
Jez
--
http://munkboxen.mine.nu - FreeBSD network
http://www.freebsd.org
Jez --
...and then munk said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% Is there a test mailing list I can use to check I have various settings in mutt
setup correctly?
Well, you've used this one, so I guess there you go. Next time send mail
to yourself or to a pal instead of all of us :-)
%
% Thanks in
Is this address working?
* On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 09:32:09AM -0400, Rebecca Wu wrote:
Is this address working?
neee ;)
Gruß, Clemens
--
sig_29
Mit statserial/setserial serielle Infos abfragen:
$ statserial /dev/ttyS0 (Ausgabe u.a. Signal und Pin)
$ setserial
I'm trying to test procmail with mutt. I'm new to mutt, and *very*
new to procmail I used a friend's procmailrc as a template, but i
need to know if there s a way to test it without losing mail.
jm
--
-
Jonathon McKitrick / [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
"I
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, J McKitrick wrote:
I'm trying to test procmail with mutt. I'm new to mutt, and *very*
new to procmail I used a friend's procmailrc as a template, but i
need to know if there s a way to test it without losing mail.
Check out 'man procmailex' It's nothing but example
I got started with this...and it helped out very much
http://www.ii.com/internet/robots/procmail/qs/
/jgh
- Original Message -
From: Jag [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 11:12 am
Subject: Re: testing procmail
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, J McKitrick wrote:
I'm trying
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 11:30:07AM -0500, J McKitrick wrote:
I'm trying to test procmail with mutt. I'm new to mutt, and *very*
new to procmail I used a friend's procmailrc as a template, but i
need to know if there s a way to test it without losing mail.
Check out
There is an excellent procmail FAQ. It shows you step-by-step method to test the
procmail. If it worked for me, it must be easy. I was able to set up procmail in my
personal mail account w/o any problem.
However, I'm having trouble w/ my work mail account. For some reason I can not "|" or
Well, i took your advice, and according to the test, this should work.
I tried the most basic possible procmail filter:
I'm trying to match subjects with 'test' in them. But every time i
send myself such a message, it disappears into oblivion.
The procmail rule sends it to 'chat', which is a
Nevermind. Figured it out.
jm
--
-
Jonathon McKitrick / [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
"I prefer the term Artificial Person myself."/
-
I realize this is a mutt list, not a procmail list,
but this is just a quick question not worth subscribing to another
list for:
Here's my test .procmailrc
Problem is, nothing sent from me is ending up in chat. it all goes to
the default directory.
In .muttrc, i have:
mailboxes
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 05:32:50PM +, J McKitrick wrote:
:I realize this is a mutt list, not a procmail list,
:but this is just a quick question not worth subscribing to another
:list for:
:
:Here's my test .procmailrc
:
:Problem is, nothing sent from me is ending up in chat. it all goes to
Enable verbose logging in procmail. And remember that you need a
local lockfile for file deliveries.
This is really off-topic here.
A searchable procmail mailing list archive is at
http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/procmail/
J McKitrick writes:
Well, i took your advice, and
24 matches
Mail list logo
