On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 12:09:32AM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> there comes up another question: Shouldn't
> that be regarded as a bug? If mutt would parse the first of those two
> quoted commands correctly, it should regard
>
> index_format="%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15
Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 1999 at 04:22:14PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > folder-hook . set index_format="%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15L (%4l) %s"
> folder-hook .'set index_format="%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15L (%4l) %s"'
>
> P.S.: this is becoming an faq, do we have an act
On Sat, Apr 10, 1999 at 01:58:04PM +0200, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
> P.S.: this is becoming an faq, do we have an active faq maintainer ?
Which brings up the question of what happened to the expected web site
enhancements ?? (www.mutt.org is still listing 0.95.1)
--
Later ...
Rich Roth ---
++ 10.04.1999, 16:22:14 (+0800) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>But I don't like the other one, which is showing the list name in the
>index menu display. For example in my mua folder, I'm only getting mail
>from mutt-users, so I'm losing authors' names and jsut being told the
>mail is coming from mutt-user
On Sat, Apr 10, 1999 at 04:22:14PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> folder-hook . set index_format="%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15L (%4l) %s"
> folder-hook mua set index_format="%3C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15F (%3l) %s"
> folder-hook sla set index_format="%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15F (%4l) %s"
>
> You ca
I'm trying to use some of the capabilities of mutt and I'm
experimenting wuth the lists command to get some of the
capabilities like threading and reply to list. But I don't like
the other one, which is showing the list name in the index menu
display. For example in my mua folder, I'm only getting
