On 1/9/07, MVallevand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What does the kernel oops look like?
By enabling extended cifs logging ( echo 1 > /proc/fs/cifs/cifsFYI )
I have found a better trace of the problem (there are actually two oops)
Here is the trace for ls -lt /usr/playlist/cancoll.m3u
inode.c:
On 1/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What does the kernel oops look like?
It's the same one we talked about before (see below) . To duplicate it
outside of mvpmc all I need to do is
mount.cifs //1.1.1.1/test /test/ -o username=guest
ls -lt /test
And the following will be in
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 07:51:13 EST, MVallevand wrote:
> On 1/7/07, Oliver von Bueren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Funny the 20070107 us slower. But I noticed a file size jump from 2.8MB
> > 20061220 to 3.1MB for 20061222. Could that be some big change having an
> > impact here?
>
> There are defi
On 1/7/07, Oliver von Bueren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Funny the 20070107 us slower. But I noticed a file size jump from 2.8MB
> 20061220 to 3.1MB for 20061222. Could that be some big change having an
> impact here?
There are definitely problems for me with the post 3.2 releases and
cifs.E
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Here's the results of the throughput tests:
>> Dongle 20061129
>> 2048: 5.2mbps
>> 4096: 9.78mbps
>>
>> Dongle 0.3.2
>> 1024: 4.21mbps
>> 2048: 6.56mbps
>> 4096: 3.54mbps
>>
>> The demux info bars only show very small amounts of blue
>> except for the 20061129/4096 test
On 07/01/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
8<
Your numbers are certainly lower than what I see, by several mbps in
most cases. What does your network look like?
Also, you're seeing the demux video buffer fill up, while the audio
buffer does not. This is normal. The audio buf
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 13:57:31 GMT, "Joe Carter" wrote:
> On 06/01/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > 8<
> >
> > What does the throughput test tell you with NFS rsize of 2048? If you
> > haven't tried a throughput test, you can run it by highlighting a video
> > and hitting th
On 06/01/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
8<
What does the throughput test tell you with NFS rsize of 2048? If you
haven't tried a throughput test, you can run it by highlighting a video
and hitting the MENU button on your remote.
The throughput test will give you a good idea
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 14:23:19 GMT, "Joe Carter" wrote:
> I'm having NFS problems with 0.3.2 which seem similar to below.
> This is on old MVP and used to work ok with the old kernel.
> I can't get a good config for the new kernel.
>
> An NFS rsize of 2048 almost works (better than 1024 or 4096) bu
I'm having NFS problems with 0.3.2 which seem similar to below.
This is on old MVP and used to work ok with the old kernel.
I can't get a good config for the new kernel.
An NFS rsize of 2048 almost works (better than 1024 or 4096) but
still has stuttering at about 4.5Mbps.
Using the myth protocol
Hi Roger!
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006, Roger Heflin wrote:
> Helmut 'Kolbi' Kolb wrote:
> > I have detected massive network problems with this constellation.
> > Whenever the MPEG Stream has above 5-6 mbps (as shown on the OSD) the
> > playback is jerking and it looks like the MVP doesnt get the data fast
11 matches
Mail list logo
