select * from a;
+--+
| id |
+--+
|1 |
|2 |
+--+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> select * from b;
+--+
| id |
+--+
|1 |
|2 |
+--+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
mysql>
mysql> select (select id from a where id=1) + (select id from b where id=1);
+-
European regulators agree with Monty that the Oracle-Sun deal threatens
database competition. Apparently Oracle means to play hardball. Meanwhile
Sun revenue fell 25% in 3rd quarter 2009; who else but an anti-competitive
giant would take a chance on buying Sun now? Story here:
http://www.economist.
You have stumbled across the secret. No, there is no difference at
all as the calculations suggested here confirm.
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/storage-requirements.html
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Waynn Lue wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I was building a table for storing email addresses
Hey all,
I was building a table for storing email addresses today and ran into an
issue that I couldn't find an answer for using Google. If I declare the
column as a VARCHAR (this is an InnoDB table), does it matter what size I
declare it as if it's between 1 and 255? I know there's an extra byt
Robin,
<<
select (SELECT dealer.FIRMID, (COUNT(*) -1) * 25.00 + 270.00 AS FEE
FROM `dealer` `dealer`
INNER JOIN `branches` `branches` ON
(`branches`.`FIRMID` = `dealer`.`FIRMID`)
WHERE (( `dealer`.`CRD_NUM` = 0 )
OR ( `dealer`.`CRD_NUM` IS NULL ))
AND ( `dealer`.`LIC_TYPE` IN (1
Initially I received "the operand should only have one column" so I removed the
dealer.FIRMID from the select statement and then the query just returns NULL.
Each query works fine on its own but I can't seem to combine it so that is
gives me the total of the fees.
Robin
>>> Ananda Kumar 11/10
Restarting isn't an option in most production environments, but I wonder why
you say that it'd take far less time after a restart ?
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Parikh, Dilip Kumar <
dilipkumar.par...@eds.com> wrote:
> But if you restart your mysql and then drop the table, It will take only
>
But if you restart your mysql and then drop the table, It will take only
2 min to drop the table.
Thanks,
Dilipkumar
-Original Message-
From: Krishna Chandra Prajapati [mailto:prajapat...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 12:04 AM
To: Michael Dykman
Cc: MySQL
Subject: Re: DRO
Update tweets, t2
set t2.active=0
where tweets.user_id=t2.user_id
and (rest of tweets where cond)
I'm on a mobile device, but that query should work, just do not leave
the tweets=t2 cond out of the where.
On Monday, November 9, 2009, mos wrote:
> At 12:13 PM 11/8/2009, John Meyer wrote:
>
> Now
make sure u have a "WHERE CLAUSE" for the update , otherwise, entire data
for that column will be seto "Y"
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:10 PM, mos wrote:
> At 12:13 PM 11/8/2009, John Meyer wrote:
>
>> Now I'm wondering if I can use this query in an update to set a variable
>> in
>> a second table
>
Hi,
I have got the correct answer now, from Linus Larsson, just forwarding
it for the archives:
---8<---
Hello, my name is Linus Larsson.
I saw you got a problem with mysql on Ubuntu 9.10, I was researching the
exact same problem and found your post. In the end I turned off
app-armo
select (SELECT dealer.FIRMID, (COUNT(*) -1) * 25.00 + 270.00 AS FEE
FROM `dealer` `dealer`
INNER JOIN `branches` `branches` ON
(`branches`.`FIRMID` = `dealer`.`FIRMID`)
WHERE (( `dealer`.`CRD_NUM` = 0 )
OR ( `dealer`.`CRD_NUM` IS NULL ))
AND ( `dealer`.`LIC_TYPE` IN (1,2,3,7,9
does the table ur trying to delete has any primary-foreign key relation.
do "show create table table_name\G"
Also instead of delete, use truncate, i t will be faster.
regards
anandkl
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:19 AM, Sebastiaan van Erk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I followed the instructions but still get:
I think triggers are your only option, here.
On 11/9/09, Sebastiaan van Erk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the following model:
>
> Domain (*)<-(1) Account (*)<-(1) User
>
> That is, each user belongs to exactly 1 account, an account can have
> multiple users; each account belongs to a single domain, an
14 matches
Mail list logo
