hello,
i had a master-master replication now one of the masters seems to be
about two days ahead of the slave
how do i make the first server in sync with the second and force any
data added to the second master to be pushed back into the first
server.
thanks
--
˙uʍop ǝpısdn p,uɹnʇ pןɹoʍ ǝɥʇ
I think that probably the mistake is in the way you are inserting the
blob.
If i understand right, you are inserting the blob with a traditional
insert statement ??, in my experience i always use prepared statements
to insert blobs, in that way the text goes exactly as the source without
any
Can somebody tell me why the last command bellow doesn't works?
mysql GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON *.* TO 'root'@'%' IDENTIFIED BY 'senha'
WITH GRANT OPTION;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.02 sec)
mysql FLUSH PRIVILEGES;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
mysql GRANT SUPER,REPLICATION CLIENT,SELECT
Force all traffic to Node A
Break/Stop replication
backup Node using mysqldump
Restore backup file on Node B
Resume replication
Install Maatkit
Should do the trick...
From: ext Norman Khine [nor...@khine.net]
Sent: 30 August 2010 15:50
To:
Information_schema is a read-only memory database.
When you create'MySqlMonitor'@'localhost', you will still see the
information_schema.
However, the information_schema will only contain table info
'MySqlMonitor'@'localhost' can access.
Information_schema behaves more like a restricted view
Hello all,
I have run dbt2 with mysql. Can I also run dbt1/3/4/5 with mysql? thanks!
-neutron
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=arch...@jab.org
Thanks Rolando for your help.
But there is one thing that is very stranger
When I use Mysql Administrator to configure the permissions that I
want for the user MySqlMonitor , everything works fine,
as you can see in the image bellow:
On Aug 30, 2010, at 12:09 PM, real...@areality.co.uk wrote:
Hello,
I'm working on a very simple stock tracking system on unix with MySQL 5 and
PHP.
Working under the assumption that all my updates would be executed
sequentially in the order they appear in the PHP script I perform
Hello everyone. I'm trying to perform a query that acts on 3 tables at once.
I'm thinking I need to produce a set of joins between all three tables to get
the results that I want, but am not sure how to go about it with nesting or
maybe there's even a better way. I need to check TableC for
I think you could do away with your right outer join of table B (which will
include all rows from B whether or not they match to C), since you are
explicitly filtering for C.State like 'Yes'. The intermediate result
doesn't necessarily need to be stored in a temporary table. You can include
Travis,
Thanks a lot! That seems to work perfectly and also cleans up the syntax a bit
so I think it's more understandable.
Michael
On Aug 30, 2010, at 7:21 PM, Travis Ard wrote:
I think you could do away with your right outer join of table B (which will
include all rows from B whether or
I've been going through the 5.1 manual and exploring the new features.
To add a secondary index to an existing table, InnoDB scans the table,
and sorts the rows using memory buffers and temporary files in order
by the value(s) of the secondary index key column(s). The B-tree is
then built in
12 matches
Mail list logo