found here:
http://roth.textdriven.com/other/final_mysql_report.pdf
The total length of our report is 10 pages. I'll paste the abstract
of the paper to give an idea of what is covered.
-Andrew Roth on behalf of Hobbe Smit (hsmit A+ cs D0+ uwaterloo D0+
ca) and Steve Hanov ([EMAIL PROT
On 10/19/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So... which of the many storage engines are you hoping to extend? It would
> be nice if you could do them all but I think we all anticipate that InnoDB
> will pose special challenges.
After a bit of group consultation, we've decided to
Thanks for the clarification and comments. I should reiterate that
for our project, we do *not* need to actually implement materialized
views, but only suggest refactoring and/or new components required to
implement them. I think implementing it would too time consuming for
a group of three stude
sible would implementing materialized views be?
2. Any reasons why materialized views haven't been added already?
3. Any web pages or archived messages relating to this. (I have
search the archives and didn't find anything.)
4. Any comments at all relating to this endeavor.
Many thanks,
-
