job, and if you
consider this approach convenient.
--
Marcello Giovagnoli
R D
Logical System S.r.l.
23, Via R. Scotellaro
I-60035 Jesi (AN) -ITALY
Tel/Fax: +39 731 200374/200378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.logicalsystem.it
as
SQL_CURSOR_FORWARD_ONLY, of course.
Anyway, if there is another method to save memory, please let me know how
I can do it, without change my code (if it is possible).
Regards
marcello
marcello giovagnoli
Logical System s.r.l.
Via Rocco Scotellaro 23
60035
Hi Monty,
Why do you need to retrieve so many rows to the client? Can't you use
LIMIT to restrict the number of result rows?
The point is that the program scans the entire table and process each row
in a diffrent way, executing other queryes inside the main SQLFetch() loop.
Someting like
moving
on the fly libpthread-0.9.so from RedHat to Slackware (the system is up and
there are 102 users connected !!!).
Could someone help me ?
Thanks in advance.
marcello
-
marcello giovagnoli
Logical System s.r.l.
Via Rocco Scotellaro 23
60035
Hi,
I'm sorry, for my previus question "To thread or not to thread "
but now all it's OK. :)
Looking at /etc/my.cnf, i could see two variables:
set-variable= thread_cache=8
set-variable= thread_concurrency=8 # Try number of CPU's*2
this should set the edge to the maximum