Hello,
I'm using MySQL 4.1.2 and it should be available utf8_polish_ci
collation. But, it seems that it is not.
# Query:
# SHOW COLLATION LIKE 'utf%'
#
'Collation''Charset','Id','Default','Compiled','Sortlen'
'utf8_general_ci','utf8','33','Yes','Yes','1'
'utf8_bin','utf8','83','','Yes','1'
The
In the documentation there is a note that 4.1.2 will be released soon. I
need some features which are available only in this version... Any
estimated date when it will be ? Sorry for asking about the same thing...
ML
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
Hello,
I've just installed 4.1.1 to see how UTF-8 is working. In my.ini I have
set default-character-set=utf8 - so all input/output data should be send
in utf-8 charset. System variables (after start) are set as they should:
character_set_serverutf8
character_set_system
Hello,
when do you plan to release 4.1.2 version ?
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you tell us, when you plan to release 4.1.1 version ?
A few weeks ago, Heikki guess was: ...before Nov 15th, 2003.
And how it looks now ?
Best regards,
ML
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL
I need to have a table that supports FULLTEXT searches. This
implies that this table should be a MyISAM table.
However, I also require that this table act as a parent for
child tables in order to support referential integrity. If I
create the child tables as INNODB tables, will
Hello,
I have a strange problem, maybe some of you will be able to explain me
something. I use LEFT JOIN as a substitute for subselects. It's true
that many subselects can be rewriten using LEFT JOIN. I have made a
query which use LEFT JOIN statement and... when there are many LEFT
JOIN's (over 3)
columns ??
Marek Lewczuk
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As far I remember full-text doesn't work with utf-8. Anybody knows the
estimated time when it will be supported ?? I next few months 4.1
version will be ready to use (I hope so...) and I wish to use utf-8
charsets, but very important issue is full-text search.
I'm also curious with InnoDB support
On our Linux server we get this error:
030722 08:09:55 mysqld started
/usr/local/mysql/bin/mysqld: ERROR: unknown variable 'ft_min_word_len =
2'
030722 08:09:55 mysqld ended [...]
It's strange becouse I can set this variable through my.ini on my
Windows. Anyone can help me solve this problem ?
At 8:20 +0100 7/22/03, Marek Lewczuk wrote:
On our Linux server we get this error:
030722 08:09:55 mysqld started
/usr/local/mysql/bin/mysqld: ERROR: unknown variable
'ft_min_word_len =
2' 030722 08:09:55 mysqld ended [...]
It's strange becouse I can set this variable through my.ini
the correct syntax is WITHOUT quotes and WITHOUT spaces.
--ft_min_word_len=2
or
-O ft_min_word_len=2 -- but -O is obsolete
but not
-O 'ft_min_word_len = 2'
But we want to set this variable in my.cnf, so the syntax shouldn't be
like this:
set-variable =
I'm trying to build mysql from the development sources of mysql 4.1.,
retreived using bitkeeper under win2k using cygwin.
I have made bk -r edit, and now I'm having a problem
running aclocal:
aclocal: configure.in: 450: macro `AM_PROG_AS' not found in library
When I make automake --version and
Hello group,
For everyone who thinks about moving from MySQL to PostgreSQL I have a
realy bad news - It's not worth. Why, You may ask... A few days ago I
have installed and tested PostgreSQL, becouse I realy need UTF-8 support
and subselects. I thought that PostgreSQL will be as good as MySQL but
If maximum speed is critical.
It's easy to lose sight of the fact that speed is not the
only criterion
in choosing a DBMS. Features, stability, security, and so on can be
just as important or more so. No single DBMS is going to win all the
prizes; the trick is to find the one with
which PostgreSQL version have you testet? If you want compare
MySQL and
PostgreSQL, than you have to use InnoDB tables. Tests with
MyISAM make no
sense. Out J2EE Application is working woth PostgreSQL 7.3.3
and MySQL
4.0.13 with InnoDB tables (we need transactions and
referencial
I agree with your opinion in 100%, but in my case I need DBMS with
features like subselectes/utf-8/stored procedures but the
speed is also
very important issue.
You might have to spend money!
You are saying that there is DBMS with all this features and it is as
fast as MySQL ?
--
Hello,
4.1 version can use UTF-8 encoding, but as far I remember there is
something wrong with this feature. Can you tell us when 4.1.1 version
will be released and is it will be fixed.
Best regards,
Marek
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To
Hello,
As you all know InnoDB doesn't support full text search. My application
is a huge news system with about 100 new news per day. All of my tables
are in InnoDB becouse of foreign keys. Today I find out that the main
feature of news system - searching - is not available. It's quite big
);
MySQL should send an error before second query, that there is the record
which is the same as the inserting one... But NO, you can add as many as
you want... Is this a bug or I'm doing something wrong.
I would be appreciated for help!!
Marek Lewczuk
POLAND
records...
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Marek Lewczuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello group,
My table look like this:
CREATE TABLE `mda_models` (
`model_id` int(10) NOT NULL auto_increment,
`make_id` int(10) NOT NULL default '0',
`model_name` varchar(100) NOT NULL default
21 matches
Mail list logo
