I am trying to use my binary Intel installation to compile PHP (which seems
to be doing a _very_ simple program). So in a statically linked
installation these references are defined in the embedded C library, but if
one is linking it with another application, it isn't.
Possibly the intel C
Unless you have a specific need for it, you could save yourself a lot of
trouble by putting select tables or databases or even clients on each
server. This also means you don't incur the added overhead of keeping the
database in sync, creating actions if a master goes down, etc. Then just
it
seamless. Would require some work to make one though.
-Mike
From: Jeff Smelser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MySQL Web Clustering...
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:43:05 -0500
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 18 June 2004 11:05 am, Mike Miller wrote
;
-M
From: Victoria Reznichenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Safe Database Problem
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:38:50 +0200
Mike Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I believe I've done everything from the book and have been fighting
with
the same problem for about 6 hours
Hi,
I believe I've done everything from the book and have been fighting with
the same problem for about 6 hours thus far.
I just upgraded from MySQL 3.23.56 to 4.0.17. In the old system, I
prevented show databases from ordinary users using skip-show-databases. In
order to upgrade I used
I receive the following warning in my hostname.err file after upgrading
from 3.23.56 to 4.0.17. Any ideas what's causing it and how to fix it?
Warning: Asked for 196608 thread stack, but got 126976
Trying to find the source- maybe a setting is too high? Linux 2.4.x
Thanks in advance,
-M
code it within your program. If this is in fact a primary key (whcih you
seem to describe it as), then it should be distinct anyway. So do an INSERT
IGNORE or even just an INSERT. It will fail upon duplicates. Check the
affected rows or the insert_id (using whatever API you use to access
The _only_ real benefit of Apache2 over Apache1 is it's thread-based model.
So why leave a stable, tried-and-true, robust Apache1 platform for no
additional benefits at all? Why break compatibility? Why use the Apache2
branch if you don't need it?
PHP itself works quite fine in a threaded
, and I'd love to split our invoice table
into years and use pack on the old years and replace the original table with
a MERGE.
--
Mike Miller
Business Analyst Applications Developer
BMG Canada Inc.
Tel: 416-586-1646
Fax: 416-586-0454
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
+--+--+---+--+-+--+--+--
--+
Anyone have any suggestions as to where I could look to fix this up?
-- Mike Miller
--
Happy 20'th Birthday, Mr. Smiley :-)
http://research.microsoft.com/~mbj/Smiley/Smiley.html
This might not be the best way, but for the people here at my office who
aren't familiar with command line interfaces, I've setup MyODBC and MS
Access. This let's them add/edit user's account info directly. The only
thing you can't do (afaik), is change a user's password.
-- Mike Miller
binary install.
--
Mike Miller, BMG Canada Inc.
Tel: 416-586-1646
Fax: 416-586-1661
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
http://lists.mysql.com
I just made the upgrade from 3.22 to 3.23.41 this weekend and had one little
hiccup.
I have a few users with host entries with wildcards (hostname = '%').
These users stopped working and were not able to login. When I added one
for the hosts they were connecting from, it began to work fine.
13 matches
Mail list logo
