RE: Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and full-text searches

2003-12-16 Thread Uros Kotnik
x' ) AND MATCH ( cds.title ) AGAINST ( '2001' ) Regards -Original Message----- From: Chuck Gadd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 21:50 To: Uros Kotnik; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and full-text

RE: Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and full-text searches

2003-12-12 Thread Uros Kotnik
MATCH (cds.title) AGAINST ('+music +mix +2001' IN BOOLEAN MODE) and artists.artistid = cds.artistid AND artists.artistid = tracks.artistid AND cds.cdid = tracks.cdid -Original Message- From: Chuck Gadd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 21:50 To:

RE: Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and full-text searches

2003-12-08 Thread Uros Kotnik
ld be satisfied with 0.5 - 1 sec. times -Original Message- From: Chuck Gadd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 13:17 To: Uros Kotnik; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and full-text searches Uros Kotnik wrote:

RE: Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and full-text searches

2003-12-08 Thread Uros Kotnik
ds, tracks I get time of 1.9 sec. instead < 1 sec. ? Regards -Original Message- From: Sergei Golubchik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 00:02 To: Uros Kotnik Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and full-text

RE: Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and full-text searches

2003-12-08 Thread Uros Kotnik
cds, tracks I get time of 1.9 sec. instead < 1 sec. ? Regards -Original Message- From: Sergei Golubchik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 00:02 To: Uros Kotnik Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and full-text

RE: Once again, three queries, same result, huge speed difference

2003-12-04 Thread Uros Kotnik
stIndex | 5 | artists.artis tId |27 | Using where | | cds | eq_ref | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 4 | tracks.cdId | 1 | Using where | -Original Message- From: Brent Baisley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 16:38 To: Uros Ko

RE: Once again, three queries, same result, huge speed difference

2003-12-04 Thread Uros Kotnik
- From: Tobias Asplund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 11:50 To: Uros Kotnik Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Once again, three queries, same result, huge speed difference On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Uros Kotnik wrote: > I posted this few days ago, but with no answer, a

Once again, three queries, same result, huge speed difference

2003-12-04 Thread Uros Kotnik
I posted this few days ago, but with no answer, also posted it to benchmark list.. Executing this SQL, takes ~5 sec. select artists.name , cds.title , tracks.title from artists, tracks, cds where artists.artistid = tracks.artistid and cds.cdid = tracks.cdid and MATCH (artists.name) AGAINST (

Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and full-text searches

2003-11-27 Thread Uros Kotnik
Executing this SQL, takes ~5 sec. select artists.name , cds.title , tracks.title from artists, tracks, cds where artists.artistid = tracks.artistid and cds.cdid = tracks.cdid and MATCH (artists.name) AGAINST ('madonna') and MATCH (cds.title) AGAINST ('music') and MATCH (cds.title) AGAINST ('