Re: order field of a table

2006-06-16 Thread theo
> > ...just realize this might get you more confused than clearing it out > for you, but what the hey. > Thanks, your answers surely help. But I was also interested in the question how to optimize the whole process. Say: In a php script, I want to delete an employee-record passing his ID to the

order field of a table

2006-06-15 Thread theo
Hi I' m a newbie and I'm sure this question has been answered many times, but I can't find the appropriate thread. Example: I have a table of people's data including a field called say "importance" like: NAME; AGE; FUNCTION; IMPORTANCE Peter; 24years, some job, 0 Anna; 22years, better job, 1

looking for info

2005-01-04 Thread Ing . Theo Formánek
lem domain. Theo Formanek

Mysql 4.1 with UTF8 support

2003-11-21 Thread Theo Dettmer
Hello, I was wondering if anybody has mysql compiled with UTF8 support. I don't have VC++ but needed to at least do some proof of concept so if someone could email the files or tell me where I could download them I would appreciate it. Thanks, Theo Dettmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- MySQL Ge

print out the datastructure of tables

2002-02-20 Thread Theo Van Stratum
Hello, I am new with MySQL and have it running on Windws 2000 server and programming with VC++ 6.0 Now converting from SQL 7.0 to MySQL I wonder if there is a way to print out the data structure of the table in MySQL? Regards Theo van Stratum Albanet Ltd (Technical Manager, Senior Programmer

html

2001-08-16 Thread Theo Richel
Is it possible to store html in Mysql-fields? Where can I find more info in this? Thanks Theo Richel - Before posting, please check: http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual) http://lists.mysql.com/ (the

aggressive dolphin?

2001-08-16 Thread Theo Richel
754> Thank you, Theo Richel

Re: unix_timestamp doesn't understand year 2038

2001-07-10 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 04:15:03PM -0400, Michael Meltzer wrote: > it not a bug, it is a feature, complain to Tomas Riche, 68 years (2038-1970) > is all the seconds that fit in 2^31 or a signed long number, which is how > the timestamp was defined a long time ago, it was always figured that some >

unix_timestamp doesn't understand year 2038

2001-07-10 Thread Theo Van Dinter
verything through "Jan 19 03:14:07 2038 GMT" should be valid. >Submitter-Id: >Originator:Theo Van Dinter >Organization: Kluge.Net - WWW Access and Internet Education Network >MySQL support: [none | licence | email support | extended email support ] >Synopsis