Jeremy D. Zawodny wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 01:09:35AM -0800, Mike Wexler wrote:
>
>
>>> Probably true. I just haven't thought too hard about it. I might
>
>>> be possible today for the *first* slave, but after that it seems
>
>>> like it can't be done.
>
>>
>> I don't see why not.
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 01:09:35AM -0800, Mike Wexler wrote:
>
> >
> > Probably true. I just haven't thought too hard about it. I might
> > be possible today for the *first* slave, but after that it seems
> > like it can't be done.
>
> I don't see why not. I'm assuming the master would transmit
Jeremy D. Zawodny wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 11:53:40PM -0800, Mike Wexler wrote:
>
>
>> Actually, I'm pretty sure it would need to be done in the MySQL
>
>> server. It could be done with either the master or the slave, but I
>
>> think the slave would be cleaner.
>
>
>
> Probably
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 11:53:40PM -0800, Mike Wexler wrote:
>
> Actually, I'm pretty sure it would need to be done in the MySQL
> server. It could be done with either the master or the slave, but I
> think the slave would be cleaner.
Probably true. I just haven't thought too hard about it. I m
Jeremy D. Zawodny wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 11:16:27PM -0800, Mike Wexler wrote:
>
>
>> This is a big improvement. What would be really cool would be to
>
>> read lock a table, copy it to the slave, and then tell the slave to
>
>> start paying attention to the binary log for *that* t
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 11:16:27PM -0800, Mike Wexler wrote:
>
> This is a big improvement. What would be really cool would be to
> read lock a table, copy it to the slave, and then tell the slave to
> start paying attention to the binary log for *that* table. Then it
> would repeat this for all
Jeremy D. Zawodny wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 09:46:40PM -0800, Mike Wexler wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> It appears to be clearer, but its hard to tell unless you are
>
>> actually trying to set it up. The first time I read it, I was
>
>> setting up replication and the same time.
>
>
>
> So
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 09:46:40PM -0800, Mike Wexler wrote:
> It appears to be clearer, but its hard to tell unless you are
> actually trying to set it up. The first time I read it, I was
> setting up replication and the same time.
So was I. And I failed the first 2 or 3 times until I made some
It appears to be clearer, but its hard to tell unless you are actually
trying to set it up. The first time I read it, I was setting up
replication and the same time.
My one concern, is it sounds like in order to set up replication you
need to bring down the master for long enough to archive al
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 10:48:29AM -0800, Mike Wexler wrote:
> I tried to set up replication using this HOWTO yesterday and I'm
> clearly missing something. I have some (hopefully) constructive
> comments to make about the manual and maybe I can even get some
> answers as to why replication isn't
10 matches
Mail list logo
