Re: 3.23.39+InnoDB = slower than 3.23.389InnoDB ?

2001-06-19 Thread Heikki Tuuri
Alex, this mysql/innobase/trx/trx0undo.c prints trace information on what it finds at database startup. Could you try compiling a new mysqld and try starting the database with the new mysqld. Obviously the recovery goes into an infinite loop, and this helps to find out why. Regards, Heikki -

Re[2]: 3.23.39+InnoDB = slower than 3.23.389InnoDB ?

2001-06-19 Thread BAUMEISTER Alexandre
Bonjour Heikki, In fact this morning Mysql is ... crashed on this server :( It never crashed with 3.23.38 :( I don't yet know if this is really a 3.23.39 problem or something else. If I'm able to restart Mysql, I will downgrade to 3.23.38 in order to see if it's back to th

Re: 3.23.39+InnoDB = slower than 3.23.389InnoDB ?

2001-06-18 Thread Heikki Tuuri
; Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, June 18, 2001 6:24 PM Subject: 3.23.39+InnoDB = slower than 3.23.389InnoDB ? >Bonjour, > > Environment: Solaris 2.8 on SPARC 64bit, Mysql-3.23.39+InnoDB. > > Mysql 3.23.38 with InnoDB support have been running for a wh

3.23.39+InnoDB = slower than 3.23.389InnoDB ?

2001-06-18 Thread BAUMEISTER Alexandre
Bonjour, Environment: Solaris 2.8 on SPARC 64bit, Mysql-3.23.39+InnoDB. Mysql 3.23.38 with InnoDB support have been running for a while now on one of my servers (for a month in fact, since the release of 3.23.38). It worked perfectly well and was able to handle the job (intens