So sprach Gerhard Schmidt am Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 04:02:54PM +0100:
> Besides the fakt tha this ID not unique. There ist the Problem that
> the ID you proposed ist an String ID and strings als Index are the
Well, but he could make a two column primary key, where the first is the
timestamp, and
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 02:37:30PM +0100, Entryon Corp., Chief Technical Officer - P.
Hasenfratz wrote:
> > > Why not use a timestamp column to guarentee the order in which rows get
> > > inserted into the table? You can then order on the timestamp column.
> >
> > Hmm, timestamp, ie. seconds as f
> > Why not use a timestamp column to guarentee the order in which rows get
> > inserted into the table? You can then order on the timestamp column.
>
> Hmm, timestamp, ie. seconds as finest resolution, might be to broad
depending on
> the hits his site will get - imagine that 2+ users access the
On 01.03.2001 11:56:59 Richard Ellerbrock wrote:
> Why not use a timestamp column to guarentee the order in which rows get
> inserted into the table? You can then order on the timestamp column.
Hmm, timestamp, ie. seconds as finest resolution, might be to broad depending on
the hits his site wi
