Re: Manual references to safe_mysqld

2002-02-14 Thread Michael Widenius
Hi! (Please continue this thread only on the internals list) Ken == Ken Menzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ken Hi Monty and Jeremy, We have been a bit reluctant to update the manual, as most of our users are still using 3.23 and could easily be confused by this. I think we should wait

Re: Manual references to safe_mysqld

2002-02-12 Thread Michael Widenius
Hi! Jeremy == Jeremy Zawodny [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jeremy On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 03:27:17PM -0500, Ken Menzel wrote: With MySQL 4.0 are we not supposed to be using mysqld_safe? Should'nt references in the manual be modified from safe_mysqld to mysqld_safe? Jeremy I think so. I just

Re: Manual references to safe_mysqld

2002-02-12 Thread Michael Widenius
Hi! Ken == Ken Menzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ken Hi Jeremey! I think so. I just did that recently in my book. Imagine how many times I got it backwards and ended up second-guessing myself. :-( Ken Yes I have that confusion all the time, but it is good to have all Ken mysql tools

Re: Manual references to safe_mysqld

2002-02-12 Thread Ken Menzel
Hi Monty and Jeremy, We have been a bit reluctant to update the manual, as most of our users are still using 3.23 and could easily be confused by this. I think we should wait until 4.0 goes into beta before doing the update. If I may suggest, Could we have two manuals online then? One

Re: Manual references to safe_mysqld

2002-01-30 Thread Ken Menzel
Hi Jeremey! I think so. I just did that recently in my book. Imagine how many times I got it backwards and ended up second-guessing myself. :-( Yes I have that confusion all the time, but it is good to have all mysql tools begin with my or mysql. Also because the installation of MySQL does