No problem, MYSQL is great and I know far less about it than I do
Oracle.
Dave
On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 06:08:07PM +0200, Tonu Samuel wrote:
> On Fri, 2001-10-05 at 17:06, David Turner wrote:
> > >
> > > BTW, this is unique in MySQL - you can have tables mixed to be
> > > transactional (InnoDB) a
On Fri, 2001-10-05 at 17:06, David Turner wrote:
> >
> > BTW, this is unique in MySQL - you can have tables mixed to be
> > transactional (InnoDB) and nontransactional (MyISAM) and use them mixed
> > in same query. All other SQL-s (as much I know) have transactions on
>
> Oracle's Global Tempora
>
> BTW, this is unique in MySQL - you can have tables mixed to be
> transactional (InnoDB) and nontransactional (MyISAM) and use them mixed
> in same query. All other SQL-s (as much I know) have transactions on
Oracle's Global Temporary Tables don't write to redo or rollback, and
on normal tab
On Fri, 2001-10-05 at 12:13, Carl Troein wrote:
> It seems to be pretty popular to have a large number of databases,
> but I guess it's mostly due to having a large number of users.
> In pthe project I'm working on now we have 3 databases, 2 of which
> are mysql and test. However, some of our tab
Tonu Samuel writes:
> > I want to setup a machine with 3000 databases, each database will have
> > 41 tables.
> This should be no problem for MySQL. Everything is depending how to you
> use MySQL.
It seems to be pretty popular to have a large number of databases,
but I guess it's mostly du
On Fri, 2001-10-05 at 09:52, José León Serna wrote:
> Hello:
> I want to setup a machine with 3000 databases, each database will have
> 41 tables. Does MySQL support this configuration? What machine do you think
> will support this configuration? The purpose is to create a website with
> PHP+M
Hello:
I want to setup a machine with 3000 databases, each database will have
41 tables. Does MySQL support this configuration? What machine do you think
will support this configuration? The purpose is to create a website with
PHP+MySQL, is this possible?
Best Regards.
---
