At 12:33 AM 9/12/01, Eric Frazier wrote:
>You forgot to metion the great new feature becoming available. Secure
>telnet, it never existed before very recently for AS/400.
>Secure huh? Yeah. There are companies making web apps for the AS/400 that
>are advertising that you can use the web and it is
At 10:30 PM 9/11/01, you wrote:
>OK mine are more respected :) j/k another point of view.
Sorry, I didn't understand your comment.
>1st You are assuming this only runs on Intel machines.
> I have MySQL running on a Sun E-4500 (8 x400mhz procs / 8GB RAM) running
>Solaris 8 on a financial inst
You forgot to metion the great new feature becoming available. Secure
telnet, it never existed before very recently for AS/400.
Secure huh? Yeah. There are companies making web apps for the AS/400 that
are advertising that you can use the web and it is more secure than the
traditional 5240 client
(wait that might be to
much)
I do have to give IBM so credit some of their apps are Open System 'like'.
- Original Message -
From: "Rich Duzenbury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: T
I realize my opinion may be unpopular in this forum, however, I have to say
that if it's mission critical, I would want an IBM AS/400. As a
consultant, I work with numerous hospital and health care companies that
each manage tens of gigs of data on their machines. There is very little
unsche
Hello,
I need some facts on how MySQL compares to an AS/400 with their
integrated data base engine. I'm talking to an AS/400 user who
claims that there is no software in the market that can hold up
against the AS/4000 in terms of speed and reliability. One
claim is that it didn't fail him once i
