Hi Bruce,
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 06:26, Bruce Dembecki wrote:
> Hi! One of my associates here read a report somewhere that mysqld when
> compiled under OS X 10.3 was 40%+ more efficient due to improvements in the
> compilers and the way 10.3 work. Also 10.3 is a 64 Bit Operating System and
> it wou
Bruce Dembecki wrote:
Hi! One of my associates here read a report somewhere that mysqld when
compiled under OS X 10.3 was 40%+ more efficient due to improvements in the
compilers and the way 10.3 work. Also 10.3 is a 64 Bit Operating System and
it would be a major benefit to us to set some of the m
Hi! One of my associates here read a report somewhere that mysqld when
compiled under OS X 10.3 was 40%+ more efficient due to improvements in the
compilers and the way 10.3 work. Also 10.3 is a 64 Bit Operating System and
it would be a major benefit to us to set some of the memory values in excess
