Devart dotConnect Data Providers Bring Most Convenient Working with Large
Models and Easier Generation of Autoincrement Fields!
New versions of Devart dotConnect data providers come with new greatly
improved model designer. It delivers the ability to create several diagrams
per model and
Hello! I'll be gratefull if you'll place our news on your page.
Best Regards,
Sergey Lazurenko
dotConnects 6.00.odt
Description: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Description:
Most Linux binaries available from mysql.com are compiled to work with glibc
versions as old as 2.0,
but the latest glibc 2.3.2 shipped by RedHat has apparently dropped support
for 2.0 symbols.
This is what you
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 07:19:01AM -0700, Mike Wexler wrote:
Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 12:07:07PM +0100, Basil Hussain wrote:
I'm quite surprised that this level of performance is available from
such standard (well, not standard as in 'common', but y'know what
1000 Queries per second.
Does anyone have any experience with a higher number of queries pr second
than this ?
Regards
Terje K
-
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
http
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 10:11:30AM +0200, Terje Kristensen wrote:
We have peeks where there is more than 1000 Queries per second.
Does anyone have any experience with a higher number of queries pr
second than this ?
About a year ago, I used mysql-super-smack and was able to hit 8,000
per
About a year ago, I used mysql-super-smack and was able to hit 8,000
per second on our [then new] server. The highest I've recorded on an
actual production application was around 5,000. But I don't watch the
numbers closely very often...
Just out of curiosity, on what hardware? My needs
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 09:54:35AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
About a year ago, I used mysql-super-smack and was able to hit
8,000 per second on our [then new] server. The highest I've
recorded on an actual production application was around 5,000.
But I don't watch the numbers
not getting any traffic
TK between 4PM and 7AM
TK We have peeks where there is more than 1000 Queries per second.
TK Does anyone have any experience with a higher number of queries pr second
TK than this ?
There can be lot of queries such as 'SELECT 1' which won't actually
make high CPU load
it is ?
Thanks in advance,
Jerome
-Message d'origine-
De : Jeremy Zawodny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoye : vendredi 7 septembre 2001 11:05
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: A question about load / queries pr second
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 09:54
Hi,
About a year ago, I used mysql-super-smack and was able to hit
8,000 per second on our [then new] server. The highest I've
recorded on an actual production application was around 5,000.
But I don't watch the numbers closely very often...
Just out of curiosity, on what
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 12:07:07PM +0100, Basil Hussain wrote:
I'm quite surprised that this level of performance is available from
such standard (well, not standard as in 'common', but y'know what I
mean...) hardware. The last I heard, 1K+ queries/sec was only being
done on extremely
Basil Hussain writes:
Hi,
I'm quite surprised that this level of performance is available from such
standard (well, not standard as in 'common', but y'know what I mean...)
hardware. The last I heard, 1K+ queries/sec was only being done on extremely
high-end Sun enterprise-level machines.
have peeks where there is more than 1000 Queries per second.
Does anyone have any experience with a higher number of queries pr second
than this ?
Our queries per sec over the last 2 days has averaged 164/sec. And we
hit peaks over 1000.
During the busy parts of the day we average about 300/sec
Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 12:07:07PM +0100, Basil Hussain wrote:
I'm quite surprised that this level of performance is available from
such standard (well, not standard as in 'common', but y'know what I
mean...) hardware. The last I heard, 1K+ queries/sec was only
Hi,
On the other hand though, it gives me some comfort that the hardware
being used in my operation will meet any future needs. We have
similar spec servers (P3-1Ghz dual-cpu, 512Mb RAM, 3x36Gb SCSI
RAID5). Maybe I should try out mysql-super-smack and see what kind
of numbers it turns
16 matches
Mail list logo
