[PR]

2011-02-01 Thread Sergey Lazurenko
Devart dotConnect Data Providers Bring Most Convenient Working with Large Models and Easier Generation of Autoincrement Fields! New versions of Devart dotConnect data providers come with new greatly improved model designer. It delivers the ability to create several diagrams per model and

PR

2010-12-13 Thread Sergey Lazurenko
Hello! I'll be gratefull if you'll place our news on your page. Best Regards, Sergey Lazurenko dotConnects 6.00.odt Description: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysq

PR: Linux binaries built for glibc 2.0 don't work on RedHat betas with lastest glibc

2002-12-28 Thread Bernardo Innocenti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >Description: Most Linux binaries available from mysql.com are compiled to work with glibc versions as old as 2.0, but the latest glibc 2.3.2 shipped by RedHat has apparently dropped support for 2.0 symbols. This is what you g

Linux 2.4.x VM and MySQL (Re: A question about load / queries pr second)

2001-09-10 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 07:19:01AM -0700, Mike Wexler wrote: > > Jeremy Zawodny wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 12:07:07PM +0100, Basil Hussain wrote: > > > > > > I'm quite surprised that this level of performance is available from > > > such standard (well, not standard as in 'common', b

RE: A question about load / queries pr second

2001-09-07 Thread Basil Hussain
Hi, > > On the other hand though, it gives me some comfort that the hardware > > being used in my operation will meet any future needs. We have > > similar spec servers (P3-1Ghz dual-cpu, 512Mb RAM, 3x36Gb SCSI > > RAID5). Maybe I should try out mysql-super-smack and see what kind > > of numbers

Re: A question about load / queries pr second

2001-09-07 Thread Mike Wexler
Jeremy Zawodny wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 12:07:07PM +0100, Basil Hussain wrote: > > > > I'm quite surprised that this level of performance is available from > > such standard (well, not standard as in 'common', but y'know what I > > mean...) hardware. The last I heard, 1K+ queries/sec

Re: A question about load / queries pr second

2001-09-07 Thread Mike Wexler
tting any traffic > between 4PM and 7AM > We have peeks where there is more than 1000 Queries per second. > Does anyone have any experience with a higher number of queries pr second > than this ? Our queries per sec over the last 2 days has averaged 164/sec. And we hit peaks over 1000.

RE: A question about load / queries pr second

2001-09-07 Thread Sinisa Milivojevic
Basil Hussain writes: > Hi, > > I'm quite surprised that this level of performance is available from such > standard (well, not standard as in 'common', but y'know what I mean...) > hardware. The last I heard, 1K+ queries/sec was only being done on extremely > high-end Sun enterprise-level machin

Re: A question about load / queries pr second

2001-09-07 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 12:07:07PM +0100, Basil Hussain wrote: > > I'm quite surprised that this level of performance is available from > such standard (well, not standard as in 'common', but y'know what I > mean...) hardware. The last I heard, 1K+ queries/sec was only being > done on extremely

RE: A question about load / queries pr second

2001-09-07 Thread Basil Hussain
Hi, > > > About a year ago, I used mysql-super-smack and was able to hit > > > 8,000 per second on our [then new] server. The highest I've > > > recorded on an actual production application was around 5,000. > > > But I don't watch the numbers closely very often... > > > > Just out of curiosity,

RE: A question about load / queries pr second

2001-09-07 Thread Jerome Ponsin
gure what it is ? Thanks in advance, Jerome >>> -Message d'origine- >>> De : Jeremy Zawodny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>> Envoye : vendredi 7 septembre 2001 11:05 >>> A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PRO

Re: A question about load / queries pr second

2001-09-07 Thread Vinche
B installation som we are really not getting any traffic TK> between 4PM and 7AM TK> We have peeks where there is more than 1000 Queries per second. TK> Does anyone have any experience with a higher number of queries pr second TK> than this ? There can be lot of queries such as 'SE

Re: A question about load / queries pr second

2001-09-07 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 09:54:35AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > About a year ago, I used mysql-super-smack and was able to hit > > 8,000 per second on our [then new] server. The highest I've > > recorded on an actual production application was around 5,000. > > But I don't watch the

Re: A question about load / queries pr second

2001-09-07 Thread alec . cawley
> About a year ago, I used mysql-super-smack and was able to hit 8,000 > per second on our [then new] server. The highest I've recorded on an > actual production application was around 5,000. But I don't watch the > numbers closely very often... Just out of curiosity, on what hardware? My nee

Re: A question about load / queries pr second

2001-09-07 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 10:11:30AM +0200, Terje Kristensen wrote: > > We have peeks where there is more than 1000 Queries per second. > Does anyone have any experience with a higher number of queries pr > second than this ? About a year ago, I used mysql-super-smack and was able

A question about load / queries pr second

2001-09-07 Thread Terje Kristensen
re is more than 1000 Queries per second. Does anyone have any experience with a higher number of queries pr second than this ? Regards Terje K - Before posting, please check: http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manua