://ronaldbradford.com/blog/beyond-mysql-ga-patches-storage-engines-forks-and-pre-releases-fosdem-2010-2010-02-11/previously;
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Zhu,Chao wrote:
> For pathces like :
>
> *EBay Patches (5.0)* have included:
>
>- variable length memory storage engine
>
For pathces like :
*EBay Patches (5.0)* have included:
- variable length memory storage engine
- pool of threads
- Virtual columns
and others like
*Google Patches (5.0 & 5.1)* included improvements in :
- statistics/monitoring
- lock contention
- binlog
- ma
d this
attention to detail with Oracle, but then Oracle costs a little more.
- Original Message -
From: "mos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 11:53 PM
Subject: Re: FW: MySQL patches from Google
This sounds a lot like what I'm attemptin
: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: FW: MySQL patches from Google
Kevin Spencer wrote:
> On 4/26/07, Mike OK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I read the Google blog post regarding these patches. They admit using
>> MySQL for some internal data storage needs but not in the gen
Kevin Spencer wrote:
On 4/26/07, Mike OK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I read the Google blog post regarding these patches. They admit using
MySQL for some internal data storage needs but not in the general search
system.
Still, that leaves many other applications. Groups, gmail, reader
ss it along here. We do tons
of
>>failover/replication and would be eager to see mySQL implment the Google
>>patches in the stock distribution. If anyone needs mission critical,
>>scaleable, and failover clusters, it's Google -- so I have every
>>confidence
>>their
On 4/26/07, Mike OK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I read the Google blog post regarding these patches. They admit using
MySQL for some internal data storage needs but not in the general search
system.
Still, that leaves many other applications. Groups, gmail, reader,
news et al...
--
Hi
I read the Google blog post regarding these patches. They admit using
MySQL for some internal data storage needs but not in the general search
system. Here is the link to the blog post
http://google-code-updates.blogspot.com/2007/04/google-releases-patches-that
-enhance.html
Mike
eager to see mySQL implment the Google
>>patches in the stock distribution. If anyone needs mission critical,
>>scaleable, and failover clusters, it's Google -- so I have every
>>confidence
>>their patches are solid and worthy of inclusion...
>
>
>This isn't surpris
At 02:36 PM 4/25/2007, you wrote:
On 4/25/07, Daevid Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A co-worker sent this to me, thought I'd pass it along here. We do tons of
failover/replication and would be eager to see mySQL implment the Google
patches in the stock distribution. If anyone ne
On 4/25/07, Daevid Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A co-worker sent this to me, thought I'd pass it along here. We do tons of
failover/replication and would be eager to see mySQL implment the Google
patches in the stock distribution. If anyone needs mission critical,
scaleable, a
A co-worker sent this to me, thought I'd pass it along here. We do tons of
failover/replication and would be eager to see mySQL implment the Google
patches in the stock distribution. If anyone needs mission critical,
scaleable, and failover clusters, it's Google -- so I have every confid
From: Mike Blazer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 7:06 PM
> To: Pete Harlan
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: mysql 4.0.20 uses just one CPU on Gentoo (now: glibc patches)
>
> Thanks Pete!
> I just recompiled mysql with the emerge installer with
Thanks Pete!
I just recompiled mysql with the emerge installer with all gentoo.org
patches - same result.
Just one CPU works.
I'll report BUG to both mysql AB and Gentoo.
Thanks
Mike
Pete Harlan wrote:
> It would be nice if the manual were updated to say something about it,
> but
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 08:03:36AM +0400, Mike Blazer wrote:
> Mike Blazer wrote:
>
> In addition to my previous posting - on this machine I have glibc.2.3.2
> which was installed using the Gentoo emerge native installer. Dunno, the
> mysql manual says a lot about various bugs
23, 2004 12:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Patches
>
> Where can I download patches for MySQL 4.0.17 from?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> MySQL General Mailing List
> For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
> To unsubscribe:
> http://lists.mysql.com/[E
Where can I download patches for MySQL 4.0.17 from?
Thanks.
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi List,
I'm using mysql-4.0.15a. But we need some specific features present in 4.1.X such as
1. INSERT ... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE query support
2. Innodb multi-table space (one ibdata file per table)
Could someone point me to patches for them for 4.0.15a release. so that I can back
Chris
On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 00:17, Sp.Raja wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I'm using mysql-4.0.15a. But we need some specific features present in 4.1.X such as
>
> 1. INSERT ... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE query support
> 2. Innodb multi-table space (one ibdata file per table)
>
>
Sp.Raja wrote:
Hi List,
I'm using mysql-4.0.15a. But we need some specific features present in 4.1.X such as
1. INSERT ... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE query support
2. Innodb multi-table space (one ibdata file per table)
Could someone point me to patches for them for 4.0.15a release. so that
up_group(thd,tables,fields,all_fields,group,&hidden_group_fields) ||
= sql/mysql_priv.h 1.89 vs edited =
*** /tmp/mysql_priv.h-1.89-24964Wed Mar 21 00:58:37 2001
--- edited/sql/mysql_priv.h Wed Mar 21 19:45:20 2001
***
*** 402,407
--
Hello
In case this patch wasn't post here.
bye,
-christian-
Package: mysql
Version: 3.23.33-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Below is a patch against mysql 3.23.31 (but applies well to 3.23.33-1) for
things to work properly on Alpha. I've been applying this diff against
most of the mysq
22 matches
Mail list logo
