Re: Problems with UPDATE in v3.23.49 (is this a bug)

2002-04-05 Thread Joshua J . Kugler
It's not illogical at all. You often want (sometimes need) that field to make sure a record has not changed when you go back to update the row. MS Access (and others) uses this so as not to overwrite changes made since the record was retrieved. You can't always rely on the client to set field=N

RE: Problems with UPDATE in v3.23.49 (is this a bug)

2002-04-05 Thread Rick Emery
CTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 10:48 AM To: 'Rick Emery' Subject: RE: Problems with UPDATE in v3.23.49 (is this a bug) Yes I did, but it is very long, and it was very long ago. Could someone please explain to me why this was done? It seems more confusing to do this than to not do t

RE: Problems with UPDATE in v3.23.49 (is this a bug)

2002-04-05 Thread Hihn Jason
t "reply to all") -Original Message- From: Rick Emery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 11:34 AM To: Hihn Jason; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Problems with UPDATE in v3.23.49 (is this a bug) No, this is NOT a bug. According to the manual (you rea

RE: Problems with UPDATE in v3.23.49 (is this a bug)

2002-04-05 Thread Basil Hussain
Hi, > I have a table whose schema contains: > id INTEGER AUTO_INCREMENT, > gen_time TIMESTAMP, > rec_time TIMESTAMP, > repeats INTEGER DEFAULT 0, > PRIMARY KEY (id), > INDEX (rec_time)) > > When I do an: > UPDATE table SET repeats=repeats+1 > > gen_time gets updated as well: [snip] > mysql> sel

Re: Problems with UPDATE in v3.23.49 (is this a bug)

2002-04-05 Thread denonymous
From: "Hihn Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I have a table whose schema contains: > id INTEGER AUTO_INCREMENT, > gen_time TIMESTAMP, > rec_time TIMESTAMP, > repeats INTEGER DEFAULT 0, > PRIMARY KEY (id), > INDEX (rec_time)) > > When I do an: > UPDATE table SET repeats=repeats+1 > > gen_time gets upd

Re: Problems with UPDATE in v3.23.49 (is this a bug)

2002-04-05 Thread Paul DuBois
At 18:33 +0200 4/5/02, Hihn Jason wrote: >I have a table whose schema contains: >id INTEGER AUTO_INCREMENT, >gen_time TIMESTAMP, >rec_time TIMESTAMP, >repeats INTEGER DEFAULT 0, >PRIMARY KEY (id), >INDEX (rec_time)) > >When I do an: >UPDATE table SET repeats=repeats+1 > >gen_time gets updated as w

RE: Problems with UPDATE in v3.23.49 (is this a bug)

2002-04-05 Thread Rick Emery
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 10:33 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Problems with UPDATE in v3.23.49 (is this a bug) I have a table whose schema contains: id INTEGER AUTO_INCREMENT, gen_time TIMESTAMP, rec_time TIMESTAMP, repeats INTEGER DEFAULT 0, PRIMA

Problems with UPDATE in v3.23.49 (is this a bug)

2002-04-05 Thread Hihn Jason
I have a table whose schema contains: id INTEGER AUTO_INCREMENT, gen_time TIMESTAMP, rec_time TIMESTAMP, repeats INTEGER DEFAULT 0, PRIMARY KEY (id), INDEX (rec_time)) When I do an: UPDATE table SET repeats=repeats+1 gen_time gets updated as well: mysql> select id, gen_time, rec_time, repea