Re: Question about autoincrement ID

2006-03-23 Thread mysql
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > To: saf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Question about autoincrement ID > > One important thing to remember: You should not let UI > design requirements dictate your DB design. Most

Re: Question about autoincrement ID

2006-03-23 Thread SGreen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (saf) wrote on 03/23/2006 11:10:04 AM: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 11:04:55AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (saf) wrote on 03/23/2006 10:50:10 AM: > > > > The short answer is "no". The Record #2 already existed. It's current > > status is "deleted". If yo

Re: Question about autoincrement ID

2006-03-23 Thread Martijn Tonies
>So I must do a big SELECT and then check my self every time (for each INSERT), >which IDs are free? No, you just ignore "deleted" IDs. What's the point? Martijn Tonies Database Workbench - development tool for MySQL, and more! Upscene Productions http://www.upscene.com My thoughts: http://blog

Re: Question about autoincrement ID

2006-03-23 Thread saf
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 04:17:44PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Lots of ways round this. Instead of deleting records, add a boolean > "deleted" flag. All selects then need to add "and deleted = 0". But you can > find a (random) deleted row with "select id from table where deleted = 1 > limit 1

Re: Question about autoincrement ID

2006-03-23 Thread Alec . Cawley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (saf) wrote on 23/03/2006 16:10:04: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 11:04:55AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (saf) wrote on 03/23/2006 10:50:10 AM: > > > > The short answer is "no". The Record #2 already existed. It's current > > status is "deleted". If you h

Re: Question about autoincrement ID

2006-03-23 Thread saf
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 11:04:55AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (saf) wrote on 03/23/2006 10:50:10 AM: > > The short answer is "no". The Record #2 already existed. It's current > status is "deleted". If you had other tables that linked their data to > record #2 and you cre

Re: Question about autoincrement ID

2006-03-23 Thread SGreen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (saf) wrote on 03/23/2006 10:50:10 AM: > Hi, > > I have a question about autoincremend id: > If I have an autoincrement id set on my first column field of my > table and I have the > following entries: > 1 > 3 > > And then I make a INSERT INTO foobar VALUES(''); , the next fie

Question about autoincrement ID

2006-03-23 Thread saf
Hi, I have a question about autoincremend id: If I have an autoincrement id set on my first column field of my table and I have the following entries: 1 3 And then I make a INSERT INTO foobar VALUES(''); , the next field would be automatically 4: 1 3 4 Is there a possibility to take a free ID