ysql
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 1:06 PM
Subject: RE: Attn: MySQL AB: we need 3.23.5x NOW !
>
> > Can someone *please* pick up the dropped ball on the
> > release schedule and run with it ? It's not such
> > a big deal for ISAM table users but it's a very big
>
> Can someone *please* pick up the dropped ball on the
> release schedule and run with it ? It's not such
> a big deal for ISAM table users but it's a very big
> deal for InnoDB tables...
>
MySQL AB: The least you could do is say: OK, we have this X problem and
still working out Y... but we anti
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 07:39:47PM -0500, Cal Evans wrote:
>
> If he build using 2.9x would it be stable? (I'm assuming that they
> are using gcc 3.x from your post)
Right on both counts.
--
Jeremy D. Zawodny, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Technical Yahoo - Yahoo Finance
Desk: (408) 349-7878 Fax: (408)
At 05:18 PM 6/5/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 04:52:39PM -0700, j.random.programmer wrote:
> > > We're running a custom-compiled 3.23.51 (or .52-pre,
> > > [..]
> > > Why not build your own?
> >
> > Hmm. The latest source on the pre-release page is 3.23.50 and it's
> > not clear
002 7:19 PM
To: j.random.programmer
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Attn: MySQL AB: we need 3.23.5x NOW !
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 04:52:39PM -0700, j.random.programmer wrote:
> > We're running a custom-compiled 3.23.51 (or .52-pre,
> > [..]
> > Why not build your own?
&
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 04:52:39PM -0700, j.random.programmer wrote:
> > We're running a custom-compiled 3.23.51 (or .52-pre,
> > [..]
> > Why not build your own?
>
> Hmm. The latest source on the pre-release page is 3.23.50 and it's
> not clear whether the "stability" issue is a bug in the code,
> We're running a custom-compiled 3.23.51 (or .52-pre,
> [..]
> Why not build your own?
Hmm. The latest source on the pre-release page is
3.23.50 and it's not clear whether the "stability"
issue is a bug in the code, the compiler or
the runtime libs.
> I can send you a binary that works for us.
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 03:58:57PM -0600, Jayce^ wrote:
>
> I know my company is having a similar problem, the reason we're not
> building our own anymore, and the same reason we're having trouble
> with the rpms is the gcc on RH which is causing us serious stability
> problems. Might have the s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I know my company is having a similar problem, the reason we're not building
our own anymore, and the same reason we're having trouble with the rpms is
the gcc on RH which is causing us serious stability problems. Might have the
same problem we're
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 11:31:56AM -0700, j.random.programmer wrote:
> If any folks from MySQL AB are reading this:
>
> I need to go into production *today* with 3.23.5x. I am using InnoDB
> heavily (and need the newer fixes).
>
> 3.23.50 hasn't even been released yet (the pre-release version is
10 matches
Mail list logo
