ECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 5:25 AM
Subject: Re: Query Log
> "Lou Olsten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm pretty sure that the answer to this is "No, you cannot" but I
figured I'd check
> > anyway...
>
> > As I go back t
Which query log are you referring to? The user and the host are both logged
in the slow query and general logs.
-Original Message-
From: Lou Olsten
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 5/3/04 4:59 PM
Subject: Query Log
I'm pretty sure that the answer to this is "No, you cannot" but I
figured I'd c
"Lou Olsten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that the answer to this is "No, you cannot" but I figured I'd check
> anyway...
> As I go back through my query log, I'd like to know the user that issued the
> statement.
> If the user is still connected, I can cross reference it with th
ds of transactions that have been committed!).
Thanks again,
Chris
Heikki Tuuri wrote:
Chris,
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Zawodny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: mailing.database.mysql
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: Query log/binlog inconsistency
On We
Chris,
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Zawodny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: mailing.database.mysql
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: Query log/binlog inconsistency
> On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 05:05:38PM -0700, Chris Tucker wrote:
> > Hi,
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 05:05:38PM -0700, Chris Tucker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running into an issue on MySQL 4.0.12 (not tested on other
> releases) using an InnoDB table type, where an update query is
> getting written to the query log but never being propogated as far
> as the binlog. The query i
