i think i am replying to this post abit late ..but go through this doc it
will probably help you
http://gurulabs.com/ext3-reiserfs.html
cheers
David Ziggy Lubowa
Network Engineer
One2net (U)
web: www.one2net.co.ug
Tel: +256 41 345466
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Gaugler [mailto:[EM
the best choice with InnoDB.
--
Chung Ha-nyung
SayClub <http://www.sayclub.com>
NeoWiz <http://www.neowiz.com>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Brodbeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:10 PM
> To: Nicholas
You might be interested in this presentation from Linux World Conference
August, 2002, which gave a comparison of Linux Journaling file system
types based on io tests run at the Open Source Development Lab:
http://www.osdl.org/presentations/lwe-jgfs.pdf
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 07:01, Michael T. Bab
--
Chung Ha-nyung
SayClub <http://www.sayclub.com>
NeoWiz <http://www.neowiz.com>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Brodbeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:10 PM
> To: Nicholas Gaugler
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTE
David Brodbeck wrote:
If Nicholas does this, I hope he'll report back here with what he finds out.
I would recommend that as well.
I'm facing the same choice very soon, for a database that will eventually have millions of entries (but each individual entry very small.) I'm trying to decide
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael T. Babcock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> I would E-mail the reiserfs list and ask for whether ReiserFS
> would be
> better for a MySQL-only partition than ext3 and see what answers you
> get. In the worst case, you'll have some extreme "resierfs is
Nicholas Gaugler wrote:
said that ReiserFS handled large amounts of files much better than ext2 or ext, but what about a MySQL database situation with a very limited numbers of files. Such as 300, or less than 100 even? Is Reiser a better FS than ext3 for MySQL when you have a very limited numb
