Re: Select by row number

2002-11-05 Thread Michael T. Babcock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a "primary key" which is not the main order to access rows. What I am emulating is a large memory space and the "primary key" is just used not to duplicate rows. Please re-read my post as well as the very manual reference you later gave; the PRIMARY KEY _i

re: RE: Select by row number

2002-11-04 Thread Egor Egorov
> There is no row number in MySQL. You should use ORDER BY to >> retrieve data in particular order. handf> What about the following info in the manual p. 55? handf> Add a PRIMARY KEY or UNIQUE key to the table and use this. New in Version handf> 3.23.11: If the PRIMARY or UNIQUE key consists of o

RE: Select by row number

2002-11-02 Thread horizonx
> There is no row number in MySQL. You should use ORDER BY to > retrieve data in particular order. What about the following info in the manual p. 55? Add a PRIMARY KEY or UNIQUE key to the table and use this. New in Version 3.23.11: If the PRIMARY or UNIQUE key consists of only one column and thi

re: Select by row number

2002-11-02 Thread Egor Egorov
I need a 20 GB + DB that I'd like to access by row number or physical order. handf> Of course I could use a special rownum column but that would be a waste of handf> space plus require an additional key whereas mySQL already maintains such handf> table internaly. There is no row number in MySQL.

RE: Select by row number

2002-11-01 Thread horizonx
There is a "primary key" which is not the main order to access rows. What I am emulating is a large memory space and the "primary key" is just used not to duplicate rows. In the current DB I use, I simply use the row number as my "memory pointer". Since rows are fixed length, it should be a strai

Re: Select by row number

2002-11-01 Thread Jan Steinman
>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >I need a 20 GB + DB that I'd like to access by row number or physical order. Are you certain? In my experience, people who claim they need to access by physical order are making a bunch of faulty assumptions, and REALLY want to access by temporal order, which is not