I've used a rule of thumb that I was told ages ago when working on other
databases that inserting records into a non-indexed table is faster
generally than inserting records into an identical but indexed table.
Makes sense to me, since it has to update the indexes in the latter case.
However
I've used a rule of thumb that I was told ages ago when working on other
databases that inserting records into a non-indexed table is faster
generally than inserting records into an identical but indexed table.
I realize that this statement is probably an antiquated guideline.and
I'd like to
