Re: two-way replication

Hello. See: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/replication-faq.html "Chris Knipe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Is two-way replication possible with MySQL 5.x? Any good sites / docs > describing this type of setup? > > -- > Chris. > > -- For technical support co

Re: two-way replication

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Chris Knipe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 7:11 PM Subject: Re: two-way replication "Chris Knipe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/28/2005 11:53:14 AM: Hi, Is two-way rep

Re: two-way replication

"Chris Knipe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/28/2005 11:53:14 AM: > Hi, > > Is two-way replication possible with MySQL 5.x? Any good sites / docs > describing this type of setup? > > -- > Chris. > > By "two-way" replication, do you mean "changes to either database are synchronized to the

Re: Two way replication lock protocol

On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 04:22:12PM -0700, Jeremy Zawodny wrote: > On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 03:44:00PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:01:27PM -0700, Jeremy Zawodny wrote: > > > On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 01:07:58PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello, >

Re: Two way replication lock protocol

On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 03:44:00PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:01:27PM -0700, Jeremy Zawodny wrote: > > On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 01:07:58PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I am wondering if anyone is currently working on a two way rep

Re: Two way replication lock protocol

On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:01:27PM -0700, Jeremy Zawodny wrote: > On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 01:07:58PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I am wondering if anyone is currently working on a two way replication > > lock protocol. If so, what's the status. I understand there's litt

Re: Two way replication lock protocol

On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 01:07:58PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > Hello, > > I am wondering if anyone is currently working on a two way replication > lock protocol. If so, what's the status. I understand there's little > gain in having two way replication but -- I am just curious. What exa

Re: Two-Way Replication

Hello. On Sat 2002-12-07 at 11:40:28 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have read 4.10.7 and the only caveat stated is that updates can occur > in different orders on the different servers. I did not mean to discourage you from using two-way replication. I just tried to explain (what I believe)

RE: Two-Way Replication

I have read 4.10.7 and the only caveat stated is that updates can occur in different orders on the different servers. Each of my updates are autonomous and that should not be a problem. Are there any other gotchas I should be concerned about. I saw a posting the stated not to turn on log-slave-u

Re: Two-Way Replication

Hello. On Fri 2002-12-06 at 15:35:53 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I am new to this list and have not been able to find an answer in the > searchable archive, So I am sorry if this question has been asked > before. > > The documentation (section 4.10.7) mentions 2 way replication but does

RE: Two-Way Replication

MySQL does not provide conflict resolution mechanism yet. So, although two-way replication is theoretically possible, it may cause serious problems, e.g. data inconsistency between two servers. -- Chung Ha-nyung Sayclub NeoWiz > -Origi

Re: Two-way replication

On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 12:09:13AM +0400, Ilya Martynov wrote: > > After some thinking I've came up with next solution. When both > servers are up theirs mysqld are setup to have two-way > replication. Since both servers serve completely independent > projects and these projects use different set