Will SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS and SELECT FOUND_ROWS() do what you want?
Regards,
Jerry Schwartz
The Infoshop by Global Information Incorporated
195 Farmington Ave.
Farmington, CT 06032
860.674.8796 / FAX: 860.674.8341
www.the-infoshop.com
www.giiexpress.com
www.etudes-marche.com
On 8/1/07, Jerry Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS and SELECT FOUND_ROWS() do what you want?
Be careful. While it will give the correct number of rows that would
have been found if LIMIT had not been used, it makes the server
compute the whole result set,
SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS isn't an option for us. Right now I am doing two
queries, but I am just trying to see if there is a better way to do the
count query than to just turn it into a dervied table and count the
results i.e. SELECT COUNT(*) FROM (big nasty query) t1.
I think what the question
On 8/1/07, Les Fletcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS isn't an option for us. Right now I am doing two
queries, but I am just trying to see if there is a better way to do the
count query than to just turn it into a dervied table and count the
results i.e. SELECT COUNT(*) FROM
