On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 09:54:32AM +0200, Wouter de Jong wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 05:05:56PM -0700, Justin Bauer wrote:
> > You can do load balancing, you just need to have the same information on
> > each server. With mysql you would use "Replication" to keep the servers
> > sync'ed.
>
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 05:05:56PM -0700, Justin Bauer wrote:
> You can do load balancing, you just need to have the same information on
> each server. With mysql you would use "Replication" to keep the servers
> sync'ed.
Well, then you'd have to do 2way replication. And that doesn't work great
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 08:55:50PM +0200, Sven Huster wrote:
> Hi
Hi,
> As far as i know, DON'T DO THIS
> mysql with serveral instances accessing the same database will not work
> as expected.
>
> check
> http://www.mysql.com/doc/M/u/Multiple_servers.html
Thanks, I'll skip the plan. No load-b
Hi
As far as i know, DON'T DO THIS
mysql with serveral instances accessing the same database will not work
as expected.
check
http://www.mysql.com/doc/M/u/Multiple_servers.html
we run mysql over nfs but only with one instance.
seems to be quite stable (db server freebsd - nfs server netapp file