@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: 1 Machine with 4 GB RAM for Big Size MySQL Data Size
On Friday 04 September 2009 08:15:35 pm muhammad subair wrote:
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 5:10 AM, mos mo...@fastmail.fm wrote:
At 11:48 AM 9/4/2009, you wrote:
One of my potential clients want to migrate
Amazon S3 as a
backup solution, it's easy to use and quite cheap too.
Cheers,
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Colin Streicher [mailto:co...@obviouslymalicious.com]
Sent: 05 September 2009 05:16
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: 1 Machine with 4 GB RAM for Big Size MySQL Data
What sort of data? Is it currently stored in a database? If so, how many
tables?
24GB of text data in a single table is quite a bit, but manageable if
maintained properly.
24 GB of binary data on the other hand, is not very much at all.
Colin
On Friday 04 September 2009 12:48:18 pm
The size of the data is largely irrelevant, it depends on how much of
it you need to use at once. For most setups, 4GB should be more than
enough. A single server is always a bad idea since it's a single point
of failure.
Concurrent users isn't really relevant with the database either since
it's
At 11:48 AM 9/4/2009, you wrote:
One of my potential clients want to migrate their application to web based
(PHP MySQL), estimates of the data size is 24GB and growth per month is
20MB of data. Unfortunately, they could only use 1 sever machine with 4GB
RAM.
The application used in intranet,
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 5:10 AM, mos mo...@fastmail.fm wrote:
At 11:48 AM 9/4/2009, you wrote:
One of my potential clients want to migrate their application to web based
(PHP MySQL), estimates of the data size is 24GB and growth per month is
20MB of data. Unfortunately, they could only use
On Friday 04 September 2009 08:15:35 pm muhammad subair wrote:
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 5:10 AM, mos mo...@fastmail.fm wrote:
At 11:48 AM 9/4/2009, you wrote:
One of my potential clients want to migrate their application to web
based (PHP MySQL), estimates of the data size is 24GB and growth
