Hello.
The complete answer could only be obtained from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Hi Everyone,
>
>I've read the GPL and LGPL and all the crazy legalese that ensues
>and it's still not
>clear - I might be a bit dense. I would like to release a
>commercial application that
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill Ataras wrote:
> Thanks. Yeah I saw the section on failover. I guess I didn't understand
> that autoreconnect in the url is now used for failover to another server
> rather than reconnecting to the same server. Is that what you mean? If
> that's t
ndle stale
connections.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 12:34 PM
To: Bill Ataras
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Connector/J 3.0.9 Unexpected end of input
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill Ataras wrote:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill Ataras wrote:
> I upgraded to Connector/J 3.09 from 2.0.14. After some hours, the driver
> looses it's connection and will not reconnect (despite setting
> reconnect=true). The error starts as follows below. I rollback to 2.0.14
> and everything i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Java "write once, run anywhere" works for Connector/J: it is the same for
> all platforms.
>
> Works under Windows 2K for me.
>
> --
>
> Quick and simple question. Does the windows ve
Java "write once, run anywhere" works for Connector/J: it is the same for
all platforms.
Works under Windows 2K for me.
--
Quick and simple question. Does the windows version of
Connector/J
run under Windows NT, the documentation implies only 9X and ME
I'm not sure about NT, but it works under 2000 (for me)
Andrew Olden
School Of Applied Sciences
University Of Glamorgan
x2227, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 July 2003 10:12
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Connector/J
Hi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Lane wrote:
| I attempted to use the limit and offset features in some of my select
| statements when using mysql-connector-java-3.0.6-bin.jar. I recieve the
| following error :
| java.sql.SQLException: Communication link failure: java.io.IOExcep
What is Connector/J. Is it just the program which runs on the server?
What GUI do you use for mysql?
Gustavo.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 March 2003 13:10
To: Gustavo Cebrian
Subject: Re: Connector/J
Your message cannot be posted
> >>The only way I can debug this is if you give me a repeatable test case.
> >>Since the test case I showed you does not repeat the bug, you will need
> >>to generate a standalone test case, with schema, data, and the java code
> >>that demonstrates the issue.
> >>
> >>-Mark
> >
> >
> > Hey mark,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tea Yu wrote:
Not really, I substituted the queryStmt with the actual one but it gave
the
same result.
After some work:
select last_insert_id();//getInt() should return 14
//but now it gives
java.sql.SQLExceptio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tea Yu wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tea Yu wrote:
Hi there!
Sorry, cause I didn't copy-n-paste those so there were typos, actually I
created the table in console:
1) create table test (id INTEGER NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, name
V
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Tea Yu wrote:
> > Hi there!
> >
> > Sorry, cause I didn't copy-n-paste those so there were typos, actually I
> > created the table in console:
> >
> > 1) create table test (id INTEGER NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, name
VARCHAR(255),
> > primary key (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tea Yu wrote:
Hi there!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tea Yu wrote:
Hi! I just tried
Windows ME + MySQL Server - 4.0.9/4.0.11 +
ConnectorJ - 3.0.4/3.0.6/3.1.0
with an InnoDB table
test (id bigint not null auto_increment, na
Yea thanks for correct this, so I'm getting the right resultSet in
console...
but still having problem thru ConnectorJ, "select last_insert_id()" returns
a String to me, rs.getString(1) throws no exception.
Tea
> You don't select last_insert_id() from table.
> This will return the last_in
Hi there!
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Tea Yu wrote:
> > Hi! I just tried
> > Windows ME + MySQL Server - 4.0.9/4.0.11 +
> > ConnectorJ - 3.0.4/3.0.6/3.1.0
> >
> > with an InnoDB table
> > test (id bigint not null auto_increment, name varchar(255))
> > also t
You don't select last_insert_id() from table.
This will return the last_insert_id() for each row of the table.
You just select last_insert_id().
Tea Yu wrote:
>Hi! I just tried
>Windows ME + MySQL Server - 4.0.9/4.0.11 +
>ConnectorJ - 3.0.4/3.0.6/3.1.0
>
>with an InnoDB table
>test (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tea Yu wrote:
> Hi! I just tried
> Windows ME + MySQL Server - 4.0.9/4.0.11 +
> ConnectorJ - 3.0.4/3.0.6/3.1.0
>
> with an InnoDB table
> test (id bigint not null auto_increment, name varchar(255))
> also tried
> test (id int not null
Hi! I just tried
Windows ME + MySQL Server - 4.0.9/4.0.11 +
ConnectorJ - 3.0.4/3.0.6/3.1.0
with an InnoDB table
test (id bigint not null auto_increment, name varchar(255))
also tried
test (id int not null auto_increment, name varchar(255))
and did an SQLQuery thru JDBC
insert
neal wrote:
> Does anyone have a preference on whether to use V2 or v3(beta) of
> Connector/J?
>
> I read on the mySQL site that there are some new features that seemed
> significnat (support of prepared statements, and 50-100% faster) ...but I
> couldn't tell if these were new as of v2 or v3. T
20 matches
Mail list logo
