Re: load-balancing with NFS

2001-06-15 Thread harm
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 09:54:32AM +0200, Wouter de Jong wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 05:05:56PM -0700, Justin Bauer wrote: > > You can do load balancing, you just need to have the same information on > > each server. With mysql you would use "Replication" to keep the servers > > sync'ed. >

Re: load-balancing with NFS

2001-06-15 Thread Wouter de Jong
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 05:05:56PM -0700, Justin Bauer wrote: > You can do load balancing, you just need to have the same information on > each server. With mysql you would use "Replication" to keep the servers > sync'ed. Well, then you'd have to do 2way replication. And that doesn't work great

Re: load-balancing with NFS

2001-06-14 Thread Wouter de Jong
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 08:55:50PM +0200, Sven Huster wrote: > Hi Hi, > As far as i know, DON'T DO THIS > mysql with serveral instances accessing the same database will not work > as expected. > > check > http://www.mysql.com/doc/M/u/Multiple_servers.html Thanks, I'll skip the plan. No load-b

RE: load-balancing with NFS

2001-06-13 Thread Sven Huster
Hi As far as i know, DON'T DO THIS mysql with serveral instances accessing the same database will not work as expected. check http://www.mysql.com/doc/M/u/Multiple_servers.html we run mysql over nfs but only with one instance. seems to be quite stable (db server freebsd - nfs server netapp file

Re: Load Balancing.

2001-02-01 Thread Nathan Cook
ator :: Programmer [ phone - 208.343.3110 ][ pager - 208.387.9983 ] - Original Message - From: "Jeremy D. Zawodny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Nathan Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 1:51 AM Subject: Re: Load Balanci

Re: Load Balancing.

2001-02-01 Thread Jeremy D. Zawodny
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 02:35:29PM -0700, Nathan Cook wrote: > > It seems like I have seen somewhere that load balancing and > fail-over-services are available for MySQL, to share the load and > mirror the data between two machines. Other than MySQL's built-in replication, which doesn't handle fa