"William Goedicke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The broader feature set of Postgres over MySQL doesn't get a lot of
> intelligent rebuttal.
True. Fortunately, many web projects don't need triggers, subselects, etc.
(and PostgreSQL is IMHO a little more difficult to manage). In those cases
speed
Dear Kevin -
Kevin Pratt writes:
>
> "IMO - mysql is just a disaster you are inviting on yourself.
Isn't there some line about everyone having an opinion...
> you should see the responses to some recent bug reports ...
>
> We have run load tests ourselves, and postgres performs much the
The reason I asked...
quote from another mail list I am on...
"IMO - mysql is just a disaster you are inviting on yourself.
you should see the responses to some recent bug reports - "we broke it
purposely because it made things faster..."
I looked over the code for the client libraries when we
Kevin Pratt wrote:
>
> I have heard mysql is the access for unix... i would like to hear about
> comparisons with Mysql SqlServer and PostgresSQL
>
> Kevin
differences are in the archives for this list as well as on the mysql.com
list.
Mysql doesn't compare will to Access. access is simply a
