Re: MySQL vs. AS/400

2001-09-11 Thread Rich Duzenbury
At 12:33 AM 9/12/01, Eric Frazier wrote: >You forgot to metion the great new feature becoming available. Secure >telnet, it never existed before very recently for AS/400. >Secure huh? Yeah. There are companies making web apps for the AS/400 that >are advertising that you can use the web and it is

Re: MySQL vs. AS/400

2001-09-11 Thread Rich Duzenbury
At 10:30 PM 9/11/01, you wrote: >OK mine are more respected :) j/k another point of view. Sorry, I didn't understand your comment. >1st You are assuming this only runs on Intel machines. > I have MySQL running on a Sun E-4500 (8 x400mhz procs / 8GB RAM) running >Solaris 8 on a financial inst

Re: MySQL vs. AS/400

2001-09-11 Thread Eric Frazier
You forgot to metion the great new feature becoming available. Secure telnet, it never existed before very recently for AS/400. Secure huh? Yeah. There are companies making web apps for the AS/400 that are advertising that you can use the web and it is more secure than the traditional 5240 client

Re: MySQL vs. AS/400

2001-09-11 Thread Lance Rochelle
(wait that might be to much) I do have to give IBM so credit some of their apps are Open System 'like'. - Original Message - From: "Rich Duzenbury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: T

Re: MySQL vs. AS/400

2001-09-11 Thread Rich Duzenbury
I realize my opinion may be unpopular in this forum, however, I have to say that if it's mission critical, I would want an IBM AS/400. As a consultant, I work with numerous hospital and health care companies that each manage tens of gigs of data on their machines. There is very little unsche