B. Keith Murphy wrote:
I dashed off this email too fast. What I meant to say was "I am
migrating our data partitions for MySQL from reiserfs to xfs because xfs
has faster write rates than reiserfs.
Those fast writes come at a price.
There is no way I'd have any important data on XFS.
Dave
Thanks for the answer :)
Yes, you are right about fedora. I forgot to tell that we are moving the
servers to CentOS 5 now :) i think also that other important thing that
i forgot to tell is that our databases use INNODB engine.
i'm waiting for other opinions.
--
MySQL General Mailing List
F
You seemed to have answered your own question. What did you mean to ask?
On 10/28/07, B. Keith Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I dashed off this email too fast. What I meant to say was "I am
> migrating our data partitions for MySQL from reiserfs to xfs because xfs
> has faster write rates
I dashed off this email too fast. What I meant to say was "I am
migrating our data partitions for MySQL from reiserfs to xfs because xfs
has faster write rates than reiserfs.
Craig Huffstetler wrote:
I agree, Fedora is not very good at production work. Reiserfs is one
of the best file system
In production we use both reiserfs and xfs. I am migrating our data
partitions for mysql because it has faster write rates than reiserfs.
You need to stop using fedora and at least use CentOS. Fedora is not
stable for production work.
Just my two cents :)
Keith
Ali Nebi wrote:
Hi,
i wan
