Jason,
You really are going to need to test this for yourself as it will
somewhat depend on your application. Raid 5, 10 or the mentioned 1+0
might work for you best.
keith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try reading on RAID1+0, though it's a bit expensive in implementation
but its great on READ
Try reading on RAID1+0, though it's a bit expensive in implementation
but its great on READ & WRITE..
Basing on the current stable version there is no built in table
partitioning.. you can do it in an application level..
-Original Message-
From: Jason Vinar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sen
