Peter Skipworth wrote:
>
> I'd heard that even in general use, some users had a noticeable increase
> in disk reads/writes under ReiserFS...it sounds like you haven't
> experienced this (?). I'm thinking about moving over to ReiserFS as well,
> shortly, and am looking for as much feedback from pe
Right,
As far as *MySQL* goes I haven't noticed this in particular. That's because
most mysql reads are indexed and use keys/caches.
As far as general performance goes, I've definitely noticed it.
(Creation/Deletion of large and large number of files is much, MUCH faster
than ext2 - and reiserfs
I have had the nulls in log-files/mail-files problem.
This is with the latest kernels that have patches relating
to this problem.
I have been working with Cris (Rieser Programmer) daily to
locate the problem
I have had no other problems and enjoy t
I'd heard that even in general use, some users had a noticeable increase
in disk reads/writes under ReiserFS...it sounds like you haven't
experienced this (?). I'm thinking about moving over to ReiserFS as well,
shortly, and am looking for as much feedback from people using it as
possible...
rega
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, William R. Mussatto wrote:
> What is the hardware (32 bit or 64) and what is the maximum files size
> MySql will support on it? Thanks.
I'm a mere end user when it comes to ReiserFS... I think you should be
able to find all information you need on http://www.reiserfs.com/
A
RE ReiserFS
What is the hardware (32 bit or 64) and what is the maximum files size
MySql will support on it? Thanks.
Sincerely,
William Mussatto, Senior Systems Engineer
CyberStrategies, Inc
ph. 909-920-9154 ext. 27
-
Befor
Jan-Aage Bruvoll writes:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote:
> > No, that is not just luck.
> >
> > ReiserFS is a journalling file system.
>
> Sure thing. The luck part was referring to the fact that even the
> consistency in the tables was ok, which is more on the luck side,
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote:
> No, that is not just luck.
>
> ReiserFS is a journalling file system.
Sure thing. The luck part was referring to the fact that even the
consistency in the tables was ok, which is more on the luck side, since
all buffers were flushed at the time of
Jan-Aage Bruvoll writes:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Simon Windsor wrote:
>
> No problems at all. Even power outages and severe crashes did not touch
> the MySQL stuff on the ReiserFS file system, but that's probably all luck.
>
> :-)
>
> Regards, Jan
>
>
No, that is not just luck.
Rei
-Original Message-
From: Jan-Aage Bruvoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 10:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ReisserFS
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Simon Windsor wrote:
> Has anyone user MySql on a ReisserFS file system ?
>
> Where any
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Windsor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 22 February 2001 16:22
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: ReisserFS
>
>
> Hi
>
> Has anyone user MySql on a ReisserFS file system ?
>
> Where any problems encountered ? and do you have any pearls of
> wisdom th
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 03:22:13PM +, Simon Windsor wrote:
> Hi
>
> Has anyone user MySql on a ReisserFS file system ?
Yes.
> Where any problems encountered ? and do you have any pearls of
> wisdom that you are willing to share ?
It "just works". :-)
--
Jeremy D. Zawodny, <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Simon Windsor wrote:
> Has anyone user MySql on a ReisserFS file system ?
>
> Where any problems encountered ? and do you have any pearls of wisdom
> that you are willing to share ?
No problems at all. Even power outages and severe crashes did not touch
the MySQL stuff on th
13 matches
Mail list logo